OK, so he and you can make assertions without evidence and expect it to be treated seriously.
Norcon has webbed feet.
Norcon has three heads.
When the arguments lost the insults begin.Norcon has webbed feet.
Norcon thinks that "".... money is thrown at immigrants as if there were no tomorrow." means the same as "EE foreigners who work for us are paid cash in hand who then claim social benefits from the tax payer paid out by the government to top up their wage"
Norcon thinks that UK employers avod paying NI and tax (but perhaps only to overseas workers)
Hysterisis and you are the ones making the claims.
If you think you have evidence to support your allegations, produce it.
Assertions without evidence can be dismissed.
Hysteris pastes a web-tale saying
"ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS/REFUGEES LIVING IN BRITAIN
Totally yearly benefit:- £29,900 "
butr has no evidence to support his allegation
Are you asking me to provide the evidence for somebody else's assertion?
That's their responsibilty. I can see it would be difficult for them if they just made the figures up or cut and pasted them from UKIP or the BNP.
I did not claim that. You are getting confused.
"ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS/REFUGEES LIVING IN BRITAIN
Totally yearly benefit:- £29,900 "
I am getting confused.
Hysteris pastes a web-tale saying
"ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS/REFUGEES LIVING IN BRITAIN
Totally yearly benefit:- £29,900 "
...... ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS/REFUGEES LIVING IN BRITAIN
Totally yearly benefit:- £29,900
looking very handsomely after immigrants