Heating hot water for a cylinder is less efficient than using a combi for hot water. I worked out the efficiency was about 55% as opposed to a combi which is much higher.
I have a 17 year old combi, it has been regularly serviced, has never broken down, has never required spare parts.I have a cylinder, open vented, with a heat only boiler. I find a can quickly run a bath, much quicker than a combi can supply, and whilst in the bath, the cylinder is recharging. When back out of the bath, there is a fresh tank full of hot water.
Lots, but mostly due to a failure of the design of the valve actuators, none changed at all, since changing to a different design.How many zone valves/actuator heads have you changed in the last 17 years Harry?
Yep you're quite right. I thought this was a normal forum but it has degenerated into the usual ****ing contest by the usual type of knowalls that you usually find on the Internet.Another pointless unhelpful series of posts for the OP to digest and have to argue against... She wants an combi, is it possible. Yes. end of.
Like the seminal I want a to build a railway sleeper retaining wall, will it retain 2ft of earth...Oh you don't want to do that you want brick.
Yep you're quite right. I thought this was a normal forum but it has degenerated into the usual ****ing contest by the usual type of knowalls that you usually find on the Internet.
If you want to have a discussion open a discussion thread...It is what is known as an ongoing discussion. If it offends, then use the 'unwatch' button..
I'm not a fan of combis, but just to be clear for the OP, combis don't use more gas overall than regular boilers, but usually rated higher for HW demand, so instantaneous gas flow is higher.the gas supply may have to be increased to supply enough gas for the combi as they tend to use more gas than 'regular' boilers do.
I'm not a fan of combis, but just to be clear for the OP, combis don't use more gas overall than regular boilers, but usually rated higher for HW demand, so instantaneous gas flow is higher.
I know, I was keeping it simple. Combi advocates might base their HW efficiency on all the daily HW in one hit. I suspect in practice there's very little difference.I would suggest that is dependent on how they are installed, pipe runs etc., and how they are used.
I know, I was keeping it simple. Combi advocates might base their HW efficiency on all the daily HW in one hit. I suspect in practice there's very little difference.
Viessmann make a combi up to 36kw that can still modulate to < 2kw in CH mode but probably a bit on the expensive side, most only modulate to ~ 5kw, too high.Probably, until it comes to the efficiency of the central heating use, where you might have a combi boiler, some 2 or 3 times the Kw output, needed, to provide the heat input needed.
Viessmann make a combi up to 36kw that can still modulate to < 2kw in CH mode but probably a bit on the expensive side, most only modulate to ~ 5kw, too high.
I’ve noticed in several recent threads references to need for a large turndown ratio, even to the extent of implying the system won’t work properly without. I’m sceptical and don’t think it makes more than a marginal improvement. The heat has to go somewhere, and generally things are most efficient at rated power - electric motors, IC engines etc. I haven't seen any figures for boiler efficiency vs turndown.I think level of ability to modulate, will be the next big advertising battle, if it's not already?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local