- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
The modern life has been designed to exclude a minority group.Which other cultures incompatible with modern life do you think should be catered for?
The modern life has been designed to exclude a minority group.Which other cultures incompatible with modern life do you think should be catered for?
Yet not one has any knowledge to offer of the legal situation, nor any counter information about the illegality of residents in relocatable property.Well trolled Himmi. You've reeled plenty in with that bait. 10/10.
Many more than 2 interactions.
Weren’t these ones were they Bernard?
You're still refusing to address the issue raised in the OP, the creation of an illegal minority group by successive legislation.
Weren’t these ones were they Bernard?
https://www.essexlive.news/news/essex-news/harold-hill-pompadours-travellers-mess-1633768
https://www.guardian-series.co.uk/n...vergreen-field-wanstead-still-not-cleared-up/
https://www.lbbd.gov.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/Witness-statement-bundle.pdf
https://www.expressandstar.com/news...-at-mess-left-by-travellers-in-west-bromwich/
Not designed intentionally for that purpose.The modern life has been designed to exclude a minority group.
Can we be sure of that?Not designed intentionally for that purpose.
It wasn't illegal for the first few centuries of their existence. The legislation has been designed to alienate them.If that is a consequence then, like millions of others who want to do illegal things, they will have to change.
Do Nomads have a vote?Democracy ???
Either way, you must be saying that certain people do not have to abide by the law of the land.Can we be sure of that?
I doubt if we can, especially the recent legislation to make it easier to evict Gypsies.
Times change.It wasn't illegal for the first few centuries of their existence. The legislation has been designed to alienate them.
Even if they do, a tiny group would not win anything democratically. That's how it works.Do Nomads have a vote?
Did they do rubbish clearance in the first few centuries of their existence then?It wasn't illegal for the first few centuries of their existence. The legislation has been designed to alienate them.
Sure, they were fine but I haven’t seen any genuine 'Gypsies' since the late sixties/early seventies.No they were not the travellers in those reports.
I suspect you might be familiar with the concept of government alienating a group and whipping up prejudice against that group. Public opinion follows and justifies the government legislating more harshly against that group, causing the group to have no alternative than to either conform or to ignore the legislation, leading to further 'anti-social' behaviour, leading to justification of even harsher restrictions, ad infinitum.Either way, you must be saying that certain people do not have to abide by the law of the land.
And some groups have little culture to loose and conform. Others refuse to conform. It's always been thus.Times change.
They might have 'champions' in the political system. As it is their voice can be inconsequentially ignored, even alienated even further, with little or no public opposition. Even, due to the enforced anti-social practices, these further restrictions are supported, leading to further enforced anti-social behaviour. Eventually, the minority group are legislated out of existence.Even if they do, a tiny group would not win anything democratically. That's how it works.
Sure, they were fine but I haven’t seen any genuine 'Gypsies' since the late sixties/early seventies.
Maybe they've been legislated out of existence.Times change.
My evidence is witnessed by me..Not media reports..You ain’t listening dude..How many times do you need to be told the same thing before it implants in your memory?I suggest that it is you that is misguided by media reports:
They show little to no respect for countryside or people in Co.Durham.Many more than 2 interactions. And in other countries,
I have found most true Gypsies to be friendly and not a cause for concern as they respect the land where they park.