Only the right wing fascist ones.would be OK if all BBC employees likened the government to Nazis?
Only the right wing fascist ones.would be OK if all BBC employees likened the government to Nazis?
in your opinionUnder the conditions which have been set by the BBC for him to WORK FOR them - he's gone too far.
Adhering to the guidance is part of the conditions for him to work for them
He puts integrity over money.Not as silly as Gary, he's lost over a million quid a year.
That's part of the tems of using him, whether you want to call it contract or not. I'd heard that it was in his written contract - ok that detail was wrong.in your opinion
theres no contractual obligation, and BBC guidelines give him more leeway
Has he damaged their reputation, or was that partly by the pressure put on by the Government to the non suspended Tim Davie.That's part of the tems of using him, whether you want to call it contract or not. I'd heard that it was in his written contract - ok that detail was wrong.
I've said many times he can have an opinion, but he went too far.
The text you show says the risk is lower, not that there isn't one , or that the effect doesn't have to be avoided.
He has compromised the BBC's impartiality and damaged its reputation, even with that low risk.
It doesn't give him a leeway to say whatever he likes.
Has he damaged their reputation, or was that partly by the pressure put on by the Government to the non suspended Tim Davie.
Double standards it seems. But 1 view point is acceptable and 1 isn't
No mention of Tim Davie. Has he not done any damage to the reputation of the BBC. If you don't see any pressure from anywhere that's your choice and opinion.I don
Well GL damaged it.
What pressure? I can only find denials.
What double standard? If you gob off a party political bit of crap like GL did,, then sure you'll get objections. It doesn't man that when predictable and correct action is taken, it's as a result of those objections. Regardless of whether the action was correct, or not.
Sounds like you're invenitng the "pressure'?
You sure?Time for one of my occasional reminders that the nazis were actually a left-wing organisation.
National Socialism.
They're allowed to express opinions as far as they like without resorting to dog-whistle phrases such as comparisons with Nazi's.Sky Sports’ Kaveh Solhekol has been praised by thousands as he goes in on the BBC regarding their Gary Lineker announcement
Kaveri said in the clip gone viral: “But a lot of people are looking at this and saying, how come Andrew Neal, one of the most high profile political journalists and interviewers on the BBC for many, many years, how come he is allowed to be the chairman of a right wing magazine, The Spectator?
“How come he is allowed to express political opinions on Twitter as much as he wants?
“How come the Chairman of the BBC, Richard Sharp, the Chairman is somebody who donated £400,000 to theConservative Party, someone who has helped arrange an £800,000 loan for the former Prime Minister, Boris Johnson.
“How come Robbie Gibb, or as we have to call him, Sir Robbie Gibb, who used to be the Communications Director for the former Prime Minister, Theresa May, how come he’s on the BBC board at the moment?
“Why is Alan Sugar allowed to say what he wants on Twitter about political matters? What about Jeremy Clarkson? He’s got a column in The Sun, he’s got a column in the Sunday Times. He was on the BBC. He frequently expressed political opinions, which many people think are extreme on social media
If it's so obvious you shouldn't have any difficulty explaining it.If you cant see the balanced picture, I am genuinely surprised at you.
Others I understand the blindness, but not you