Riots and damage compensation

That would be like Kamala Harris not correcting Trump's persistent lies, and proving that he is an habitual liar.


Nothing of the sort, as Trump's lies are self-evidently so.

The whole basis of your defence against the accusations is they are unproveable.
But it is as valid to say that they are true-but-unproveable, as it is to say that they are false-but-unproveable.
 
Sponsored Links
And you openly admit to committing fraud on several levels and over a period of seven years.
Might have been eight.
Your car is still in Spain.
Is it?
Are the people who are using it aware that it is totally illegal, not covered by any insurance, despite you fraudulently insuring as if it was in UK.
Do you remain responsible for the users of cars that you've owned in the past?
Or if you have sold it, is the new owner aware that it's not been tested for seven years, and it's only MOT certificates have been obtained, and issued fraudulently?
Don't know and don’t care.

Anything else you’d like to know?
 
Nothing of the sort, as Trump's lies are self-evidently so.

The whole basis of your defence against the accusations is they are unproveable.
But it is as valid to say that they are true-but-unproveable, as it is to say that they are false-but-unproveable.
I haven't tried to defend the claims/allegations.
I'm content to bask in the legend. :giggle:
 
Sponsored Links
You've refused to deny or confirm it.

Do you remain responsible for the users of cars that you've owned in the past?
I've never illegally sold a car, nor knowingly sold a car I know to be illegal.
Nor fraudulently obtained a MOT certificate, nor fraudulently obtained insurance to give an appearance of a car being used or existing in a country legally.
I've never driven or carried passengers in a vehicle I know to be untested, untaxed and uninsured.

Don't know and don’t care.
I have used reckless to describe your criminal behaviour.
 
Hence my post below:
You appear to acquiesce to unproven, unsupportable allegations, as long as those allegations are aimed at others.
That would encourage those making the unproven unsupportable allegations to continue with their nonsensical behaviour.
Are you comfortable with those who exhibit such behaviour?
 
Patriotic Englishmen my arse

https___d1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net_production_8b680161-4aad-4fde-80f4-970eb17ac890.jpg
 
Are you comfortable with those who exhibit such behaviour?


I'm bored with the childish presence of a soporific, self-important, and unnecessarily-verbose @rsehole who repeatedly reincarnates themselves on this forum, each time with a different username.
One that evidently derives a tragic amusement from (in their own head, at least) the "mystery" of it all.

Make of that, what you will.
 
I've no desire to recreate the discussion all over again.
But let me be clear, I did not accuse anyone of being wrong, nor of accepting anyone of being right.
My last comment was a "wait and see" suggestion.
The 2016 Act has not yet been tested in the real world.
I proposed we agree to differ until such time as more light is shed on the issue.
That is my present position and will remain until more light is shed.
The act has of course been tested. Prior to the Riot Compensation Act we had the Riot Damages Act 1886. Plenty of claims and payouts.
 
I'm bored with the childish presence of a soporific, self-important, and unnecessarily-verbose @rsehole who repeatedly reincarnates themselves on this forum, each time with a different username.
One that evidently derives a tragic amusement from (in their own head, at least) the "mystery" of it all.

Make of that, what you will.
Yet you choose not criticise those making the persistent unproven, unsupportable allegations.
Weird that, don't you think?
But then you do subscribe to those same unproven, unsupportable allegations.
 
To make my name more in keeping with my legend, I've just applied to change my user name to Mrs Ten Names.
I'll wait to see if it's approved. :giggle:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top