Permanently infuriated.
Gullible.
Reads only third rate right wing garbage.
Despises foreigners.
Overweight (and bad breath probably).
Wears God awful coloured corduroy trousers and a country style cloth tie (optional).
Permanently infuriated.
Gullible.
Reads only third rate right wing garbage.
Despises foreigners.
Overweight (and bad breath probably).
Wears God awful coloured corduroy trousers and a country style cloth tie (optional).
Permanently infuriated.
Gullible.
Reads only third rate right wing garbage.
Despises foreigners.
Overweight (and bad breath probably).
Wears God awful coloured corduroy trousers and a country style cloth tie (optional).
Equality a) you're resorting to utter nonsense as usual. WTF does equity have to do with gammons?
It's not racist and any attempt to include it with other obviously racist words is ludicrous nonsense.
No...why would I .... I'm not interested in crap slogansRead the article. They influence opinions. That is why they are used - anything remotely related.
Pinky red = gammon speaks for itselfYou forgot one thing............. I'll give you clues.....
•They are a pinky red...
•You've described them this way many a time
•Generaly English and hang to the right
However...How many people accused of racism have said "I wasn't being racist when I said..........."
Pinky red = gammon speaks for itself
Hang to the right = covered on my list with points 3 and 4.
Thanks anyway, but no need to make them look any worse.
However...
When a 'Notter' posts obsessively and negatively about racism, black people and the cause to stamp it out, you know you are onto something. Especially when more posters start to notice.
Indeed hooray an admission, least one admits it's about the colour.You forgot one thing............. I'll give you clues.....
•They are a pinky red...
•You've described them this way many a time
•Generaly English and hang to the right
I think you're getting a bit flushed in the face with your mental gymnastics.Could Mo Farah, Dianne Abbot or Priti Patel be called Gammon?
How would you respond to the proposition that Truss is only there for the very short term to do the following:On another note this morning i hear straight away 'today Liz will have her first clash with Kier in the commons later this morning'
WTAF it's not the UFC ring ffs.
Im waiting for a leader to say "no, we waste too much time with infighting. Kier isn't my opposition he carries some pertinent detail that i will happily work with him and his team to combine our efforts and help improve out country in a more efficient manner." Wouldn't that be refreshing??
Secondly i see Liz has booted every single Rishi fan out of her cabinet far as possible down the ranks. So these lot will be disgruntled and ****ed off and form the next bunch looking for another leader to follow and oppose Liz. Fking idiots. Despite some of them actually having the talent or insights to complete work in progress/projects etc, instead we have a handover for all this roles, and we all know how that goes when someone is pulled from their role.
And don't for a minute think this is a Tory thing, they all do it, hence Geography teacher was booted due to the same cause and effect, and still have the Corbyn rebels floating around giving Starmer the same issues.
No-one has yet given a universally accepted description of a gammon. Nosey is definitely not the universally accepted definer of words.Ask Nosey for a description
Irrelevant diversion.If someone from another country calls me a "Brit" Would it be deemed to be as offensive as if I called someone from Pakistan a "****" as its only an abreviation.