Rwanda Poll

[denso13]

London Bridge murders: Westminster Bridge murders; 7/7 bombing; Manchester Arena bombing

All carried out by British born attackers. How do you invade your own country?

 

[Deleted member 294929]

What ratio of good to bad people is acceptable to you?

Not one single bad person is acceptable

 

[Deleted member 18243]

All carried out by British born attackers. How do you invade your own country?

Many of them are not British born, but in any case the ones that are British born are not really British because they live an entirely foreign life here and hate Britain and its people - they are a fifth column.

It is dishonest to use the "British born" technicality to try and sidetrack the matter.

 

[crystal ball]

Many of them are not British born, but in any case the ones that are British born are not really British because they live an entirely foreign life here and hate Britain and its people - they are a fifth column.

It is dishonest to use the "British born" technicality to try and sidetrack the matter.

Can you explain what a "British life" looks like?

 

[denso13]

It is dishonest to use the "British born" technicality to try and sidetrack the matter.

No sidetracking. You claimed it is an invasion and used a few incidents which were actually carried out by British nationals. It isn't me who is struggling with this.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

Can you explain what a "British life" looks like?

Yours, I expect.

No sidetracking. You claimed it is an invasion and used a few incidents which were actually carried out by British nationals. It isn't me who is struggling with this.

Good for you if you are not struggling; many people are.

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ne...immigration-worsens-the-cost-of-living-crisis

 

[crystal ball]

Yours, I expect.



Good for you if you are not struggling; many people are.

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ne...immigration-worsens-the-cost-of-living-crisis

That's a no then

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Many of them are not British born, but in any case the ones that are British born are not really British because they live an entirely foreign life here and hate Britain and its people - they are a fifth column.

It is dishonest to use the "British born" technicality to try and sidetrack the matter.

I don't entirely disagree with your assertion, however it can also be asserted some of the views you hold aren't 'British' in terms of their content. I would hope the majority of people born in the UK would be disgusted with the suggestion that migrants should be shot at and, if necessary killed, to dissuade others from crossing.

 

[denso13]

Good for you if you are not struggling; many people are.

Any proof of an invasion yet?

 

[Deleted member 18243]

Not one single bad person is acceptable

The very fact that an illegal immigrant is illegal means they are bad in the first place. However, if you don't believe that, how would you go about identifying those that in your opinion are the bad ones?

And, once you have weeded out the bad ones, how do you propose to pay for the good ones that you let in?

Each immigrant is another place taken in the NHS queue; another increase in council tax and NI; another school place taken; another postponement of the old age pension increase and another piece of green belt built upon.

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/ne...immigration-worsens-the-cost-of-living-crisis

 

[Justin Passing]

Andy you seem to be enjoying this thread, jerking from one false claim to another when it's pointed out you're wrong.
Tell us, how many refugees from war zones do you think the UK should take in - as we're one of the world's richer countries - and what method do you propose they use to apply?

 

[denso13]

The very fact that an illegal immigrant is illegal means they are bad in the first place.

No it doesn't.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

I don't entirely disagree with your assertion, however it can also be asserted some of the views you hold aren't 'British' in terms of their content. I would hope the majority of people born in the UK would be disgusted with the suggestion that migrants should be shot at and, if necessary killed, to dissuade others from crossing.

If it were a more "conventional" form of invasion such as a foreign army landing on the beaches or foreign planes dropping bombs on us, would you agree to them being shot at?

 

[denso13]

If it were a more "conventional" form of invasion such as a foreign army landing on the beaches or foreign planes dropping bombs on us, would you agree to them being shot at?

Of course. What a stupid question.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

Andy you seem to be enjoying this thread, jerking from one false claim to another when it's pointed out you're wrong.
Tell us, how many refugees from war zones do you think the UK should take in - as we're one of the world's richer countries - and what method do you propose they use to apply?

Although you are a wet Liberal type that's a good question, because you mention numbers, which means you are thinking in terms of of limits; something that the loony left never ever discusses.

At the moment we should take NO more foreigners, legal or illegal, because we already have far too many; do not know how many and have no control over them. In principle I do believe in taking in genuine refugees, but there should always be a defined limit. There should be a defined limit in the number; in the time they stay and in where they stay. By that last point I mean they should be contained in an area rather than allowed to move freely through the country as they are now. Most importantly, the cost of their stay should be recovered in the future from whatever belligerent nation or group displaced them.

We had Kosovan refugees over here in the 1990s. They caused no problems and eventually returned safely to their homeland. Do the people we currently call refugees intend to eventually go home?

As for how refugees should apply: through official channels.

Also, nobody has pointed out that I am wrong!