When you have all finished analysing my comments, let me contribute my explanation. Simply, I re-registered purely to ridicule woody for his unwarranted allegations, and to try to provoke him into an acknowledgement that he was wrong, or to provide some evidence that his accusation was justified.
He is incapable of admitting he was wrong, and I know he cannot provide evidence to support his allegation.
Then when Mightyblab starts with her silly accusations, and calling me some other names, even sillier observations, and even dafter juvenile pictures, I retaliate by calling her a silly name. When she mirrored woody's unwarranted allegation it was a blatant attempt to 'jump on a bandwagon'. So I retaliate. Fair's fair.
Then seeing arse end's lies and deceit I use similar tactics against arse end. He still deserves it for his enormous lies and deceits, e.g. claiming a disability, so that he is not ridiculed, and his sexist attacks against my imaginary spouse. Now he may be softening his comments, trying to convince us his right-wing fake news was joking all along. They were still right-wing fake news, e.g his pretend concern for women in far away places while he abuses my imaginary spouse close to home, ergo, lies and deceit!
Doggit, Mitch, Brigadier, et al, well if you insult me, you must expect a little in return. Anyone else that wants to hurl insults around, or silly allegations, do not expect to do it with impunity. I suspect many others have the same retaliatory instinct.
On a lighter note, if I see something with which I inherently disagree with, or I think is blatantly wrong, I will, probably, say so. But I reserve the right not to, of course.
