With a highly desirable 'thanks' to 'posts' ratio like Norcon has (sarcasm), it looks like this thread has changed from talking about scrap to looking at carp (sp) posts from Norcon.
I'm not from darn sarf and rarely work there but I understand how these rates can easily be justified, but why should it? It's nothing compared to what companies such as BG charge per hour but people think they are the bees knees.
Going back on topic, I can remember reading a thread on here about a guy swapping parts on boilers, leaving the parts with the customer to prove a part has been changed and that it is not been used to repair another boiler. The engineer received a letter from his local council in essence stating, as he replaced the parts, he is therefore responsible for the correct disposal of said parts. Going off this, tradesman are responsible for the disposal of all waste generated by their work. This incurs increased charges for the tradesman in terms of vehicle insurance, waste disposal licences, public liability, time taken to dispose of the waste (unpaid), etc. etc.
It costs more to have work carried out by the book!
James.