I could only fit one hilarious laughing bloke on the page otherwise I would. Thanks for the heads-up though.Loads of em
I could only fit one hilarious laughing bloke on the page otherwise I would. Thanks for the heads-up though.Loads of em
I could only fit one hilarious laughing bloke on the page otherwise I would. Thanks for the heads-up though.
It doesnt matter how man times people bang the same drum, longer sentences don't mean less crime.
But surely that doesn't mean longer sentences shouldn't be given? Otherwise where is the justice for victims?there is simply no quick solution to crime
tougher sentencing either for purposes of reducing crime or retribution is simplistic but not the answer.
It doesnt matter how man times people bang the same drum, longer sentences don't mean less crime.
Most are that fat they are housebound never mind out on the rob.Talking to the locals, you can leave your house open and go on holiday for a month.
No they don'tSure they do. You are conflating "less crime" with "no crime".
Otherwise, why not argue for no sentence at all?
No they don't
USA number of people in jail has increased 7 fold bet 1970 and 1990
Crime did not go down.
USA number of people in jail has increased 7 fold bet 1970 and 1990
Crime did not go down.
I think you are intelligent enough to know that's just a dumb point scoring argument.Otherwise, why not argue for no sentence at all
Crime goes up, so prison population goes up.
Well, duh
The UK hasn't experienced a policy harsher punishments used as an attempt to reduce crime.Is Sussex in the US of A?
Prison population went up due to the dumb idea that harsher sentences reduce crime.
I am being really thick today