Dare I suggest that a visual inspection (tech-speak 'for having a look') behind the socket would have averted pinching the neutral?
Dare I suggest that a visual inspection (tech-speak 'for having a look') behind the socket would have averted pinching the neutral?
Well, I think you're being slightly facetious now.if you'ld also care to explain to me how to look behind a faceplate I have just fastened up...........the result of which was the pinching of the neutral.
Well, I think you're being slightly facetious now.if you'ld also care to explain to me how to look behind a faceplate I have just fastened up...........the result of which was the pinching of the neutral.
I am sure you do not normally fit sockets and switches without dressing the wires so they fold in safely.
Obviously, this one got away.
Yes.Are you suggesting that qualified electricians should not be able certify that they have staisfied building regs?
Yes.Are you suggesting that qualified electricians should not be able certify that they have staisfied building regs?
Kind Regards, John.
True, but that was a genuine question on my part, not an expression of any opinions of mine.Yes, but this whole discussion has evolved from you asking whether we should test 'minor' works to comply with Part P, and how much testing should be done.
Indeed, and I see no elements of madness in it. If there is any scope for debate, it'e really only about how many/which tests are strictly necessary following minor works.I was trying to show that there is a method in the madness of the IEE when they suggest the tests required and the order that you should do them.
Quite - but, as I've said, it's not "my way". As you have implied yourself, I tend to behave more like an electrician than a DIYer in some senses!If I did it your way......the good old 'bang' test - then yes, I would have discovered there was a fault.
It's not a question of certifying that 'you know what you are doing' - you could know that and yet still do it badly or make mistakes. In any safety-critical field, I would expect someone other than the one who had done the work to inspect and 'approve/certify' it.So in your world, none of us (with 2360 or 2330, 238 or 239 should be able to certify we know wht we are doing.
Exactly the same procedure as if a DIYer notifed work to an LABC.How do you want things changing. I rewire a house and say to the client "I'm done so get in touch with your council and ask them to send their guy out to check my results and commission your installation?"
scousespark wrote:
How do you want things changing. I rewire a house and say to the client "I'm done so get in touch with your council and ask them to send their guy out to check my results and commission your installation?"
Exactly the same procedure as if a DIYer notifed work to an LABC.
It's not a question of certifying that 'you know what you are doing' - you could know that and yet still do it badly or make mistakes. In any safety-critical field, I would expect someone other than the one who had done the work to inspect and 'approve/certify' it.So in your world, none of us (with 2360 or 2330, 238 or 239 should be able to certify we know wht we are doing.
If the industry could get its house in order and ensure, and demonstrate, that 'black sheep' had been all but eliminated, then I might be persuded to think differently.
Exactly the same procedure as if a DIYer notifed work to an LABC.How do you want things changing. I rewire a house and say to the client "I'm done so get in touch with your council and ask them to send their guy out to check my results and commission your installation?"
Kind Regards, John.
As I said, exactly the same procedure as when a DIYer notifies work to an LABC - at least unless/until the industry can get its house in order.Who do you suggest does the test and inspection? Would that be another qualified electrician?
You could ask the same question in relation tyo DIY electrical work. However, if you deny the existence of 'black sheep' in the electrical trade, I'm not sure there is any basis for us to have a sensible discussion.Black Sheep? Where are the electrocuted bodies piled, or the houses burning down after the black sheep have done some domestic work?
However, if you deny the existence of 'black sheep' in the electrical trade, I'm not sure there is any basis for us to have a sensible discussion.
Kind Regards, John.
Nah, they're disqualified - I would not know how to define a black sheep outside of the jurisdiction of both BS7671 and Part P - and, anyway, they have the wrong number of volts and Herz and drive on the wrong side of the roadi could only find the one -
http://www.blacksheepelectric.com/
As I said, exactly the same procedure as when a DIYer notifies work to an LABC - at least unless/until the industry can get its house in order.Who do you suggest does the test and inspection? Would that be another qualified electrician?
You could ask the same question in relation tyo DIY electrical work. However, if you deny the existence of 'black sheep' in the electrical trade, I'm not sure there is any basis for us to have a sensible discussion.Black Sheep? Where are the electrocuted bodies piled, or the houses burning down after the black sheep have done some domestic work?
Kind Regards, John.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local