It is. Why do you ask?One question - is the basin in place already?
It is. Why do you ask?One question - is the basin in place already?
As the basin is there already, why not hang a mirror above it to hide the unsightly work?It is. Why do you ask?
Good point - and that would still be true even if the basin were not yet there!As the basin is there already, why not hang a mirror above it to hide the unsightly work?
...but you could.That's obviously a possibility. However, the feed will be coming from a lighting circuit which is ('as the cable flies') a good few metres from the mirror position, and I wouldn't normally use flex for that.
...but you could..... just as for, say, a hard-wired cooker, the final bit of cable is obviously flex, but I would not run flex all the way back to the origin of the circuit.
Yes.Yes, that could be done but, as above only if I used flex all the way back to wherever i was getting the feed from. Would you do that?
Maybe by necessity.I wouldn't say that it is all that unusual to have hard-wired loads fed by a short length of cable (usually flex) from a nearby 'connector' of some sort, is it?> In fact, at least some of the wall lights in my house have such ';local connectors'
Connect the CPC.Another ';interesting' question! .... How does this work with ;'safe' (aka dangerous!) zones?
Strictly speaking, a back box in which no cables are terminated (e.g.one as you suggest, with a cable just 'passing through') does not create a safe zone and,in any event, my 'accessory' will no longer be visible if/when a mirror is installed.
I would say the mirror with a light creates a safe zone for its entire width.I will install the cable in what would be a safe zone if the back box created one, but how ('strictly speaking') is one meant to handle this situation? The mirror, per se, presumably does not create (enormous) safe zones?
To do that I would have to dissect out the CPC from the flex which was passing through. I think it's probably stretching things to say that would constitute "connecting the cable to a point, accessory or switchgear" and, in any event, it would be pretty meaningless (in terms of creating a safe zone), anyway, since the accessory would not be visible once the mirror was in place.Connect the CPC.
Hmmm. Do you really believe that a mirror with a light counts as a "point, accessory or switchgear", because I don't think I would. Do yiu believe that, for example, a massive TV on a wall creates massive safe zones, both horizontally and vertically?I would say the mirror with a light creates a safe zone for its entire width.
I'm not in the slightest worried, but it seemed like an 'interesting' regulatory point for discussion. I actually think that, in many situations, these 'safe zones' are really a joke -particularly when (as is my case) one is dealing with a cable (particularly flex) dangling 'somewhere' within a stud wall!With just an ordinary mirror in place, it would not. If that worries you, what about a label?
So it seems. Although a few people have offered opinions, maybe my question about whether it was 'likely' that there would be space behind is not one that can be easily answered!1 - there are a vast number of mirrors, cabinets and variants available, all with differing sizes, spaces, cable connection locations and the rest.
As you presumably understand, that is my current plan/intention. I don't think we are likely to be talking about cabinets.2 - If the mirror doesn't yet exist and it's imperative to get this cable into place before the mirror is obtained, then fit a 25mm single gang metal box flush in the wall at a height just below where the top of the mirror will be, so that when installed, the mirror/cabinet covers the box completely.
Cable should be a 3C&E, with switched line, permanent line, neutral and CPC.
3 - For temporary purposes, attach suitable connectors to the end of the cable and fit a blank plate over.
....
A plate can be fitted over the box, or if the mirror is screwed to the wall and can't be removed without tools, the box can be left open and the cabinet back form the enclosure.
I wasn't referring to a cable passing through; I was referring to your situation - of course.To do that I would have to dissect out the CPC from the flex which was passing through.
Then people will have to rely on something else.I think it's probably stretching things to say that would constitute "connecting the cable to a point, accessory or switchgear" and, in any event, it would be pretty meaningless (in terms of creating a safe zone), anyway, since the accessory would not be visible once the mirror was in place.
Yes. If not where do you draw the line?Hmmm. Do you really believe that a mirror with a light counts as a "point, accessory or switchgear",
Ok. Perhaps that is why this thread is such hard work.because I don't think I would.
Given that 'safe zone' refers to an area where people think there might be buried cables, how can you not believe that?Do yiu believe that, for example, a massive TV on a wall creates massive safe zones, both horizontally and vertically?
Ok.I'm not in the slightest worried, but it seemed like an 'interesting' regulatory point for discussion. I actually think that, in many situations, these 'safe zones' are really a joke -particularly when (as is my case) one is dealing with a cable (particularly flex) dangling 'somewhere' within a stud wall!
Well, of course it can't be answered - easily or otherwise.Although a few people have offered opinions, maybe my question about whether it was 'likely' that there would be space behind is not one that can be easily answered!
Yes, but that is your opinion and/or experience, not necessarily shared by everyone else
Fair enough - but, as I said, no matter what 'situation' one has an accessory ceases to be useful as an ndicator of possible cable routes when iut is not visible!I wasn't referring to a cable passing through; I was referring to your situation - of course.
Quite so - but that's common sense, whereas UI was talking about ('strict compliance with') regulations.Then people will have to rely on something else. Might anyone seeing an illuminated mirror think there is without doubt a cable somewhere?
I have to say that it has never even occurred to me that, in the context of defining 'safe zones', "any point, accessory or switchgear' included 'current-using equipment' (particularly large items of such equipment), and I still find it very hard to believe that such is the intent of the regs. What do others think?Yes. If not where do you draw the line? A shaver/light surely is so how wide or high is allowed.
Given that 'safe zone' refers to an area where people think there might be buried cables, how can you not believe that?
It obviously does, but I thought I was clear (at least, by implication) in indicating that I was talking about 'safe zones' as specifically defined in BS7671?I think it depends what one thinks 'safe zone' means.
On the basis of that comment, it sounds as if you still have not 'got it'Well, of course it can't be answered - easily or otherwise. If everyone said it was 'likely' all mirrors had a space behind, what good would that be?
Of course I wouldn't. "Likely means what it says, and is very different from 'inevitable'. It';s subjective, so people will vary in their opinion, but 'likely' presumably always indicates a probability greater than 50%, but definitely less that 100% (for which a much stronger word would be used).If you then found one that hadn't, you would be the first to let us know but the answer would still be correct.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local