- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,567
- Reaction score
- 2,669
- Country
It’s so that the keeper can identify the customer rather than say we don’t know who was driving.Interesting in that it specifies 'user' rather than 'driver'. I wonder if it's been tested in court? The lessor 'uses' the vehicle as a source of income by hiring it to the lessee. The lessee (the OP) 'uses' the vehicle to provide a means of transport for him and his wife. The wife 'uses' the vehicle (if she were driving) to transport her husband.