Also people who have already had it.just his rationale that children do not transmit the disease,
Why can they not still inhale it and then sneeze or cough it out again?
Also people who have already had it.just his rationale that children do not transmit the disease,
Why can they not still inhale it and then sneeze or cough it out again?
But kids are carriers and spreaders, and have parents and grandparents who will catch it from them, and will die.
School is the perfect breeding ground for all viruses.
More people will die if schools open now, we might be passed the peak, but only just. And the schools are not ready - at least, the 2 my kids go to are not, they've told us so this week.
Apocalypse NOW!
What a lot of ******!
Look at the data :
As long as the old are shielded the risk, is incredibly low. Children not only seem largely immune, they are less likely to pass it on. Children, their parents and probably most of their teachers account for <2% of deaths.
.View attachment 192475
Apocalypse NOW!
What a lot of ******!
Visited 3 schools yesterday. All of whom. Need to install out side hand washing facility's
All had some children in class and have had since this caper started
And?
My source is from the ons website, it comes up when you click the link. All I did was convert to a pie chart and consolidate the gender.Sorry your link to your source is your spreadsheet, not to any verifiable source.
I say again, your pie chart does not indicate what it represents, deaths due to Covid, deaths where Covid is present, deaths where Covid tested positive, etc.
It just says "involving Covid"
Also, your spreadsheet mentions "includes non-residents". What does this mean?
My comment was not about sacrificing old people, it was about deaths (of all ages) being less important than the economy.
If children are allowed to mingle, and their transmission rate is equal to adults, (and the jury is still out on that one) increased number of deaths is more or less inevitable. The R rate will probably go back over 1.
And?
And?