- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,110
- Reaction score
- 2,737
- Country
I'm asking you a question - this is why there is a question mark at the end.
“The statement says the rules are ‘clear’ and ‘the facts speak for themselves’. But nothing is proved (a ‘prima facie’ case only). Is it really clear that the rules apply to informal/personal contacts, not about government business, but about a possible future job?” he said. “Acoba has approved the appointment. They received no evidence that government business was discussed, or that there was any effect on Sue Gray’s impartiality while she remained in government service.”
Is all you can say...
when the truth is out there - Naughty Sue broke the rules and probably would have been sacked.
So you don't want to answer the question then ?More false smears by naughty motorbiking.
(Note the absence of a question mark)
Show us your evidenceconfirms she was secretly briefing the press.
“Acoba has approved the appointment. They received no evidence that government business was discussed, or that there was any effect on Sue Gray’s impartiality while she remained in government service.”
Does it change anything towards lying, deceitful, dishonest scumbag Boris?Is all you can say...
Have you found it yet?Where is this alleged "press release" that @motorbiking bragged about?
She gone. But still there….
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff Sue Gray quits
She is leaving after rows over pay and donations and will take up a new role as the prime minister's regional envoy.www.bbc.co.uk