Suella's been sacked.

[Mottie]

Should I have voted for that government

No

Did you?

 

[Odds]

Should I have voted for that government that went to war on a lie...

You were quite happy to vote for the government who lied through their teeth til their pants went up in flames over Bre*it.

 

[gant]

The rate of processing was far higher then.

back to the drawing board for you…again

Because there were fewer numbers, do you put it on?

 

[Roy Bloom]

Wanting to reduce illegal immigration, wanting to uphold law and order, protect UK citizens and discourage hate marches. We don't want politicians like that, sack the bastards.

It's as much about the 'how' as it is the 'what'

 

[IT Minion]

Because there were fewer numbers, do you put it on?

Do you? They were processing a higher number of applications than they are now. If the number of arrivals was lower then,that's even worse.

 

[gant]

Do you? They were processing a higher number of applications than they are now. If the number of arrivals was lower then,that's even worse.

How do you know that pro rata.?

 

[IT Minion]

How do you know that pro rata.?

Pro rata doesn't enter into it. These are absolute numbers. They're easily found if you look for them.

 

[Odds]

 

[Roy Bloom]

How do you know that pro rata.?

Pro rata to what?

 

[gant]

Pro rata to what?

Like for like obviously do you put it on?
It's obvious the boat situation is a lot different than it was in 2010. Plus mobile phones have added another area of sophistication where an army of lawyers are latching onto these 'asylum' seekers for renumeration hindering the asylum process.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Like for like obviously do you put it on?
It's obvious the boat situation is a lot different than it was in 2010. Plus mobile phones have added another area of sophistication where an army of lawyers are latching onto these 'asylum' seekers for renumeration hindering the asylum process.

If you want to make a pro rata argument you need to present the figures of what you are comparing to the same set or subset of figures elsewhere, or another time, or different conditions.
You can't just thow in a "pro rata" argument without knowing what 'like' you're comparing with 'like'
What specifically are you comparing, and with what time or place or under different conditions?

 

[gant]

Bloom it's pointless engaging with you on the topic as you lie and twist to put yourself in a favourable light. Tell it to the Marines if you've any more to say.

 

[IT Minion]

In reality awful IT systems, massive turnover and the loss of the Dublin agreement have slowed the process dramatically. Plus the hostile environment making people more hesitant to approve.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Bloom it's pointless engaging with you on the topic as you lie and twist to put yourself in a favourable light. Tell it to the Marines if you've any more to say.

How do you know that pro rata.?

Pro rata to what?

So you can't explain what your 'pro rata' claim was based on?

 

[securespark]

Tell it to the Marines if you've any more to say.

What the heck does that mean?