joe-90 said:It says THE father not HIS father. So THE father could be any man that had fathered children as well as the childs father (two fathers).
Good thinking, but sorry to say - nope
joe-90 said:It says THE father not HIS father. So THE father could be any man that had fathered children as well as the childs father (two fathers).
Hmm. You say "the little boy and his grandad begin their walk over the bridge, and the father does the same" so it could be argued that the father is doing the same as the boy, i.e. walking with his grandfather. Therefore when you say no-one else gets on the bridge this is true because you have already implied the prescence of the father's grandfather.Gary_M said:A little boy is walkng with his grandad. They reach a bridge, and the little boy notices his father approaching the other side of the bridge. The little boy and his grandad begin their walk over the bridge, and the father does the same from the other side. No one else has got onto the bridge, or were already on it. When they meet in the middle, there are 4 people. Why is this?
Moz said:Moray,
I just googled that area ,
an they gave a list of Monty Pythonesque stature ,
where there is no social life for them scots but edujaction, edujaction, edujaction,
an wee boys are learnt the scriptures at two ,
an latin at 3 ,
an then the eggheads wander about aimlessly as youths discussing the merits of plato over an irn bru outside the co-op,
think royston Vasey but for interlects ,lol
then they go online an we got Gary_M here with his weird unnatural picture games , enticing us to the strange forbidden pleasure of learning an .....then we is all lost too the Devil ...
Moz said:Gary_M
I held off the bit about the tefal foreheads , lol
to be honest though google your town an see , lol
ninebob said:Come on, enough of the banter, is my answer right?
Gary_M said:Ok, here is the answer (you are all going to hate me!!)..............the little boy was cr*p at counting