Damocles said:So thats ff is better than mm, which is better than mf. right. Doesn't that rather suggest the whole notion of a legal age of consent is a bit absurd?
Heres another on, if I remember it right. 60 year old chats up (etc!) 16 year old. 16 year old chats up 15 year old. Guess who might be breaking the law?
IIRC there are actually various legal exceptions in the age of consent, depending on the age of each partner and their gender. For instance, it is unlikely that two 15 year olds sleeping together would be slapped with statutory rape. Also, a magistrate would be unlikely to convict a 16 year old for having consentual sex with their 15-year old partner.
A portuguese friend tells me that in Portugal they don't really have a legally-defined age-of-consent, instead relying on a case-by-case judgement. Apparently it works, a 35-year-old won't think "Well, she looks 18 and says she is" and then find out she is 15. Instead people tend to stick to people their own age or who most definitely ARE legal. I am rubbish at guessing ages, at 21 I was going out with a 28-year old, we both thought the other was 24 and thus not too big a gap! But there was no way either of us could have been illegally young by any stretch of precocious adolescence.