Yes, it was bad taste to some. But I don't want to live in a country that stops that freedom. The fact the police are getting involved now is what IS outrageous. I didn't think coppers were arbiters of what is considered comedy, nor should they be.
He was a DJ, presenter. And he's never been a comedian like Brand, so not the same.
Are you inferring that a person who writes comedy is a comedian in the entertainer sense of the word?He writes comedy
Are you inferring that a person who writes comedy is a comedian in the entertainer sense of the word?
I remember doing a double-take when I heard that comment first broadcast while I was making my tea, as it was unusually bad taste for Radio 4 (or politically-correct FM as I like to call it). The trouble is the double-standard currently pervasive in the media (and social media) class. If a right-wing personality had made the same joke it would be all over the Guardian front page before you can say "twitter storm". Anna Soubry would be calling for new legistlation; Owen Jones would be writing about the rise of incitement to populist Nazi street violence; David Lammy would be tweeting furiously about how it mocks the horrific suffering of actual acid-attack victims; Sadiq Kahn would make a little video about how all Londoner's agree it won't divide them; police cars would have extra H8-speech stickers on standby.
But when it's celebrated feminist joe Brand, suddenly the same people are uncharacteristically quiet. "It's just a joke bro, what's your problem Nigel I thought you were pro free speech, it's not incitement if you're on the right side, you're making a fuss about nothing, lol what a censorious stick in the mud!"
I think you're being deliberately obtuse.Are you telling me that a comedian doesn't write comedy or a song writer doesn't sing or a cheese maker don't eat cheese?
And there again is the context. To say if a right wing person had made those comments then the context would be different. It's comparing chalk and cheese tbh.I remember doing a double-take when I heard that comment first broadcast while I was making my tea, as it was unusually bad taste for Radio 4 (or politically-correct FM as I like to call it). The trouble is the double-standard currently pervasive in the media (and social media) class. If a right-wing personality had made the same joke it would be all over the Guardian front page before you can say "twitter storm". Anna Soubry would be calling for new legistlation; Owen Jones would be writing about the rise of incitement to populist Nazi street violence; David Lammy would be tweeting furiously about how it mocks the horrific suffering of actual acid-attack victims; Sadiq Kahn would make a little video about how all Londoner's agree it won't divide them; police cars would have extra H8-speech stickers on standby.
But when it's celebrated feminist joe Brand, suddenly the same people are uncharacteristically quiet. "It's just a joke bro, what's your problem Nigel I thought you were pro free speech, it's not incitement if you're on the right side, you're making a fuss about nothing, lol what a censorious stick in the mud!"
You can substitute a right-wing comedian equivalent if it helps you to understand. Imagine Jim Davidson making the same joke that eggs thrown at Gordon Brown should be acid, or something.And there again is the context. To say if a right wing person had made those comments then the context would be different. It's comparing chalk and cheese tbh.
My septicemia was funnier than her.far funnier than Jo Brand.
My septicemia was funnier than her.
Thanks for the patronising comment.You can substitute a right-wing comedian equivalent if it helps you to understand. Imagine Jim Davidson making the same joke that eggs thrown at Gordon Brown should be acid, or something.
Exactly. We all have different tastes.My septicemia was funnier than her.
Thanks for the patronising comment.
And no, makes no difference. He's a comedian, same as Brand.
As we're being patronising towards each other, please understand what context means.