The Prorogation of Parliament

Prorogation of Parliament

  • Right

  • Wrong


Results are only viewable after voting.
Not that old chestnut again, you know as well as I do that it's possible to have special arrangements under WTO pending negotiations. So, in reply to your question will the eu place tariffs UK imports, we don't know yet, nobody knows yet, stop pretending you do.
Did Rees Mogg tell you that?

Did you check it against the actual WTO rules
Or did you believe his lies
 
Sponsored Links
Stop lying.

WTO does not allow MFN status, its the same rule for all.

Why do you persist with the lies?

Article 24 which you refer to depends on already an agreement in placer. We are heading out, third country status.

Why do you persist pushing debunked lies.

Do you lie to your kids?


It's not as easy as some people have suggested I'll grant you that, but it certainly is possible.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/brexit/no-deal-brexit-and-wto-article-24-explained/
 
If they are laws you abide by them, so he is chooing what to abide by. The party thats about Law and Order.

Equally I could say OK let's have a referendum, and whatever the result, we will honour the will of the people, sound reasonable?
 
Sponsored Links
It's not as easy as some people have suggested I'll grant you that, but it certainly is possible.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/brexit/no-deal-brexit-and-wto-article-24-explained/

No it's not. Point out where it is.

Third country status. Then we are negotiating a FTA with the EU but we need an interim agreement to trade under article 24 but that will be blocked as no Interim Agreement has been signed since 1995.

So we again a third nation trading with the EU.
 
Equally I could say OK let's have a referendum, and whatever the result, we will honour the will of the people, sound reasonable?

Is it a binding or non binding referendum.

If it was a binding referendum then any foul play would mean it would be rejected.

If it was non binding then there is no need to implement it if there is foul play.
 
Hmm. Roughly 65/35 on here for prorogation. If the belief is that prorogation will lead to a no deal Brexit, that sums it up pretty reasonably. Would you remainers say that was a clear majority? :LOL:
 
So,the last ref,,not binding,just a question..Next ref,,Ferkin absolutely binding,one off forever if you remains win it!,,oh yes,,because we know more now...we will know more next week,,,and the next,,and the next...Time is running out for Gina Miller,John Major and Jezza...The Courts do not want to say ya or na to Brexit..The lords will slow everything down and nothing will be passed into law to stop Brexit or even delay it...No wonder you are all losing your sense of humour..Even you numpties know you are basically shafteddddddddd..
 
Stop lying.

WTO does not allow MFN status, its the same rule for all.

Why do you persist with the lies?

Article 24 which you refer to depends on already an agreement in placer. We are heading out, third country status.

Why do you persist pushing debunked lies.

Do you lie to your kids?
Don’t you know,,Sir Gal knows everything,,he is the next PM,,bank of England gov,chancellor in waiting...In that 6 inch gap between his lug holes
 
Don’t you know,,Sir Gal knows everything,,he is the next PM,,bank of England gov,chancellor in waiting...In that 6 inch gap between his lug holes
Looks like it would be a toss up between Sir Gal and the Fact Hunt.
 
Oh great.

Please can you prove it then.

Your earlier link says otherwise

Is a temporary agreement a possible solution?
Trade law experts point out that a temporary agreement is possible while the UK is negotiating any type of a final trade deal with the EU. Indeed Dr Lorand Bartels of Cambridge University has drafted a short, bare-bones trade agreement to show that this is technically possible. The draft Withdrawal Agreement would also qualify.

The UK cannot do this alone though. Under GATT Article XXIV, a WTO member would not be able to act unilaterally, in other words both parties to this future trade agreement would have to agree to it for it to apply.

Moreover, GATT Article XXIV only applies to forming a customs union or a free trade area for goods. In talks of a future UK-EU relationship many other aspects of trade have to be settled such as the level of regulatory alignment, mutual recognition of standards, and crucially, trade in services, for which the equivalent to GATT Article XXIV is GATS Article V.

Article XXIV is key to any preferential trade relationship between the UK and the EU. However, it is unlikely that the option of an ‘interim agreement’ will be of immediate use. Article XXIV is much more likely to be used for a full free trade agreement.

If all parties are willing, it is possible. The EU might not be willing, we might not be willing, I don't know that, nor do you. I do suspect neither party will want tariffs.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top