The "light" that one views things by is imagined anyway. So Your argument is spurious.
The reflected light is real but our interpretation of it is different .
The "light" that one views things by is imagined anyway. So Your argument is spurious.
Light is just a small part of the energy released in nuclear fusion, but it is part of it.But the sun is not losing mass through emitting light, I believe......
Put simplistically, two hydrogen atoms fuse to create one helium atom, which weighs slightly less than the two hydrogen atoms. The missing mass is converted into energy right across the spectrum from radio waves to gamma waves in accordance with E=MC2, visible light is part of that so I reckon the sun is losing mass through emitting light.
No, in the same way it can't have mass one minute and not the next.So if a ball bounces off a wall the ball has zero mass???
Positive. Anything that travels at that speed can not and does not have any mass.Are you sure about that?The light never had mass.
How do you know?Positive. Anything that travels at that speed can not and does not have any mass.Are you sure about that?The light never had mass.
What does that mean?Solar sails work by them being of energy.
How do you know?[/quote]Because we would all be dead.Positive. Anything that travels at that speed can not and does not have any mass.
The reflective nature of the sails is key. As photons (light particles) bounce off the reflective material, they gently push the sail along by transferring momentum to the sail.
But momentum is a product of mass times velocity, so for light to have momentum to transfer it must have a little mass.The reflective nature of the sails is key. As photons (light particles) bounce off the reflective material, they gently push the sail along by transferring momentum to the sail.