Is it the moral question or an ethical dilemma, from your pov?Irrelevant to whether the PM speaks out or not. I'm undecided on the proposals by the way.
Is it the moral question or an ethical dilemma, from your pov?Irrelevant to whether the PM speaks out or not. I'm undecided on the proposals by the way.
He is the bossIrrelevant to whether the PM speaks out or not. I'm undecided on the proposals by the way.
And that's why he doesn't want to influence others.He is the boss
Hard to split the two, just the thought of ending life "early". Genuinely not sure either way.Is it the moral question or an ethical dilemma, from your pov?
It's a free vote so can't give his own views. Seems some Labour people have - it's still a free vote. Cross party as well.And that's why he doesn't want to influence others.
Those are the details I was talking about...Like brexhit there are unthought through consequences of this bill. Does it create a new “human right”? How does it affect insurance, or IHT planning? Should someone exercising the right, be discriminated against because of it, for example non payout of an otherwise valid life policy that will pay off the mortgage? If only on practical grounds, MP’s should give this one an early bath.
We elect MPs for these very multi angled decisions.The people should be allowed to decide on this, not a bunch of self serving politicians!