Hi all,
I'll try and keep this as brief as possible.
I rented out our house August 2016. Three months prior to renting I refurbed the ensuite shower room (not big) by stripping out the original dob and dab non moisture resistant plasterboard and replacing it with 12mm thick marine ply (which was sealed with PVA), new tiles, new grout with tile sealer. The whole ensuite was tiled along with another bathroom with the same tiles, grout and sealer.
The new tenants were in only 2 months and complained to the Letting Agent that the grout was all of a sudden stained in lowish areas of the shower area and how should they clean it. Advice was given by myself via the Agency but with a warning not to use anything abrasive. I also asked for pictures of the affected area of before and after any works they carried out.
The before shots showed there was low level slight brown stains in some of the grout but the grout seemed to be intact and unbroken. To me it looked like someone had tried to use fake tan and then tried to wipe it off but some of the stain got onto the white grout.
The shower is an overhead non removable type.
A month after the tenants 'cleaned' the grout, the agency took more pictures (via a 3 month inspection) the top layer of grout was missing and/or cracked and the stains although reduced, apparently kept appearing.
I immediately pointed out to the Agency that this was damage caused by over cleaning and that it would need to be resealed by the tenants straight away. Basically nothing happened regarding my complaints.
Many emails to the Agency later for other things and I was not informed of any other problem with the shower area. I was stupidly busy to keep checking with them to see if it had been sorted.
Fast forward to January whereby I get an email from the Agency saying the tenants had emailed again saying the brown staining in the shower area was back, worse and now there was more cracking. Many emails later of who was responsible (Agency blamed me and I blamed the tenants) got no where and I resolved to pay for someone (who the Agency knew and trusted) to re-grout the entire shower area.
In the agreement of the contract of works (in February) I requested pictures before during and after and set out (to the Agency) how I would approach the the re-grouting as a guideline of my expectations.
The two key areas of notifications were to ask the tenants not to use the shower area so it could dry out thoroughly and for the contractor to use tile sealer when he replaced the grout.
All parties agreed to the contract of works in mid February 2017.
I get an email today which said the Contractor had apparently been to the property (on the 11th of April 2017) and allegedly removed the grout, he says he found that the worse hit grout was even browner deeper in as he removed the old grout and according to him it was full of moisture. I had warned everyone that this was a possibility if the tenants kept using the shower area. He then allegedly regrouted the tiles so they were 'waterproof' but noticed the brown stain was already coming through the newly applied grout. He then proffered to say he suspected the substructure was also damp and that all of the tiles needed to be replaced to stop the staining.
My wife thinks he's trying to create work for himself.
I can't believe that when he was there if he had suspected there was underlying moisture why the hell did he regrout it instead of calling the Agency straight away and leaving it exposed and tell the tenant not to use the shower area until it was dry. They have another perfectly usable bathroom/shower room so would not be inconvenienced too much.
What do you guys think?
Any of this sound fishy to you given the amount of work I did prior to the tenants moving in?
I'll try and keep this as brief as possible.
I rented out our house August 2016. Three months prior to renting I refurbed the ensuite shower room (not big) by stripping out the original dob and dab non moisture resistant plasterboard and replacing it with 12mm thick marine ply (which was sealed with PVA), new tiles, new grout with tile sealer. The whole ensuite was tiled along with another bathroom with the same tiles, grout and sealer.
The new tenants were in only 2 months and complained to the Letting Agent that the grout was all of a sudden stained in lowish areas of the shower area and how should they clean it. Advice was given by myself via the Agency but with a warning not to use anything abrasive. I also asked for pictures of the affected area of before and after any works they carried out.
The before shots showed there was low level slight brown stains in some of the grout but the grout seemed to be intact and unbroken. To me it looked like someone had tried to use fake tan and then tried to wipe it off but some of the stain got onto the white grout.
The shower is an overhead non removable type.
A month after the tenants 'cleaned' the grout, the agency took more pictures (via a 3 month inspection) the top layer of grout was missing and/or cracked and the stains although reduced, apparently kept appearing.
I immediately pointed out to the Agency that this was damage caused by over cleaning and that it would need to be resealed by the tenants straight away. Basically nothing happened regarding my complaints.
Many emails to the Agency later for other things and I was not informed of any other problem with the shower area. I was stupidly busy to keep checking with them to see if it had been sorted.
Fast forward to January whereby I get an email from the Agency saying the tenants had emailed again saying the brown staining in the shower area was back, worse and now there was more cracking. Many emails later of who was responsible (Agency blamed me and I blamed the tenants) got no where and I resolved to pay for someone (who the Agency knew and trusted) to re-grout the entire shower area.
In the agreement of the contract of works (in February) I requested pictures before during and after and set out (to the Agency) how I would approach the the re-grouting as a guideline of my expectations.
The two key areas of notifications were to ask the tenants not to use the shower area so it could dry out thoroughly and for the contractor to use tile sealer when he replaced the grout.
All parties agreed to the contract of works in mid February 2017.
I get an email today which said the Contractor had apparently been to the property (on the 11th of April 2017) and allegedly removed the grout, he says he found that the worse hit grout was even browner deeper in as he removed the old grout and according to him it was full of moisture. I had warned everyone that this was a possibility if the tenants kept using the shower area. He then allegedly regrouted the tiles so they were 'waterproof' but noticed the brown stain was already coming through the newly applied grout. He then proffered to say he suspected the substructure was also damp and that all of the tiles needed to be replaced to stop the staining.
My wife thinks he's trying to create work for himself.
I can't believe that when he was there if he had suspected there was underlying moisture why the hell did he regrout it instead of calling the Agency straight away and leaving it exposed and tell the tenant not to use the shower area until it was dry. They have another perfectly usable bathroom/shower room so would not be inconvenienced too much.
What do you guys think?
Any of this sound fishy to you given the amount of work I did prior to the tenants moving in?