So you admit that the term Gammon is based on skin colour /ethnicity and not political choices.I'm guessing anyone can be guilty of a good rant. Not sure whether you could attribute gammonism to those without the pink skin though.
Thank you.
So you admit that the term Gammon is based on skin colour /ethnicity and not political choices.I'm guessing anyone can be guilty of a good rant. Not sure whether you could attribute gammonism to those without the pink skin though.
claiming that voting Leave caused cancer.
Did you see this:You are the one who has comprehension problems.
This part of the thread was a discussion about the Perjorative term Gammon being used to demonise Leave supporters.
As Gammon is a type of processed pig meat why did you feel it necessary to post a link about the danger of processed meat causing cancer.
Was it a Freudian slip by yourself.
Read the above.OK, I have reread your post, I can now see the context.
I thought for a moment you were claiming that voting Leave caused cancer.
If your posts were not so boring and predictable I would take the time to read them properly.Did you see this:
View attachment 163060
The part of my post which I've drawn a box round is called a "quote".
It means that the post I made was in response to the text I "quoted", not to anything else.
You really are totally (%$*^%(%#@ useless at this, aren't you.
There is more to Trump than people realise.Trump said it was wind turbines that cause cancer. You need to be upto speed with Science!
Your fecking posts are not worth reading properly because they are always the same.As I said - you really are totally (%$*^%(%#@ useless at this, aren't you.
Now you think that it's OK to reply to posts without reading them properly.
Your fecking posts are not worth reading properly because they are always the same.
Most of the time they are just deranged rants.
Your fecking posts are not worth reading properly because they are always the same.
Most of the time they are just deranged rants.