Not all people on benefits are the same, some (most) cope, others don't, so is it the benefit system at fault, or a minority of claimant's can't prioritise ?
The examples I mentioned are caused by a deliberate toxic attitude by the benefits system designed to cause harm.
Look at PIP assessors -a privatised system, the assessors are trained to reject applications.
We know thats true because over 50% win on appeal.
The benefits system was broken, it made it difficult for people to work, because many ended up worse off.
But please dont just assume that because some dont prioritise but could manage, then conflate that as though everybody on benefit are scroungers.
It is a stereotyped argument desinged to incite hatred against people on benefits.
There are millions that are in work suffering poverty.
And there are many that go hungry.
Why do you think schools offer free breakfast or after school meal clubs -because parents cant afford the food.
There are many people that refuse to go to food banks because they are too proud.
Im happy to have a sensibke debate about benefits, but lets drop the stereotyped, Daily Mail propaganda.