L
LooPrEvil
Last trucks I drove had a cruise control so set it at 56mph and that's exactly what it did. This is why lorries can stay relatively close to each other in the inside lane.
To answer Loo's question about how people can video it,. It was obviously filmed from the opposite carriageway. Would you have pulled over onto the hard shoulder and ran across 3 lanes of motorway? I know I wouldn't.
What about TV crews who video dreadful things every week? Are they any different ? Ok I'll admit they usually film things after the event, but it's not unknown for them to be on the spot when something major happens. Should they stop filming to help in some emergency?
So why overtake and hog two thirds of motorway lanes for miles to overtake when your vehicles are limited to that speed? No wonder it takes thems miles of road to do an overtaking manoeuvre. But my suggestion to make areas within 1 mile of slip roads no overtaking zones for HGVs etc of each other would assist in improving road safety. They should only be allowed to use the middle lane in these areas for allowing other vehicles to enter the motorway.
The original footage has now been removed from the BBC website, but although I would agree it was taken from the opposite carriageway, it was not taken from a moving vehicle.
Re the media, John, I agree with your points, but yes, I believe saving and assisting people should be a first priority over obtaining footage - to me its more about ethics. But that said, professional footage of the immediate aftermass can benefit any later enquiry in to the events - the police themselves now take footage as well.
A few years ago I would have said our HGV drivers must have been the safest and most courteous in the world - unfortunately not any more from what I witness when driving