You can, of course, use a kettle when doing the dishes.
As I have been for the last 10 days since the immersion heater died!You can, of course, use a kettle when doing the dishes.
It sounds as if you may misunderstand.In terms of tangible benefits, it would be nice for the “on-demand”/boost water to heat up quicker (which it would with the top element of a twin element cylinder). ... This would also mean that I’d not need to leave the “on-demand”/boost element on for as long to get the water up to a suitable temperature as with a single top entry element ....
That's not quite right.In view of the above, you may well want to re-consider whether you want/need a second element. With just one ('bottom') one, if you needed a 'boost' at a time when the element was not normally 'on', you could just switch it on for as long was needed to get as much 'immediate' hot water as you needed - and it would heat as much water, and as quickly, as would using an additional 'top element' to achieve that.
I think we're saying the same thing. I am not a plumber or heating engineer, but surely if I had for argument's sake a 10" element and a 20" element of the same rating, then the 20" element is going to distribute the energy into twice as much water therefore it would take twice as long (maybe not quite twice as long as the hot water from the longer element does rise) to heat the top 10" of water.It sounds as if you may misunderstand.
...
Just as an aside , if you are still going with two elements of some kind, plumbers merchants around here quite a few years back, use to stock a "one shot switch", such an item switch the supply for the heater L on dependant upon whether the stat was calling and you pressed the button, once the stat was satisfied then it switched off and stayed off until the button was pressed again, otherwise it stayed off.
...
That's obviously literally true, since the temp of water in the cylinder below the top element will rise slightly, but only 'slightly' - so what I wrote was 'essentially true' (see 'proof of pudding' comments at end of this message).That's not quite right.
As I implied, I'm not convinced that there is much point IF one is prepared to switch power to the bottom element on/off (for a 'boost') just for the required period of time. The 'advantage' of having a top element is that, even if it is left switched on, it will not significantly hdat more than the water at the top of the cylinder.That would mean there is no point in having a top element.
It will only take very slightly longer (because of the 'not quite true' issue above. The bottom element thermostat will only switch the element off when the entire contents of the cylinder have got up to pressure, long after a smallish usable amount of hot water is available from the top of the cylinder (having been heated by the bottom element and then 'risen up'.The bottom element will take longer (and therefore cost more) before the water at the top of the cylinder gets "hot enough" - i.e. when the thermostat switches it off.
No. No matter where the water is heated, the amount of heat energy transferred to the water will be the same in a given period of time, and the heated water will rise to the top. See what I've just written to EFLI - in particularly my 'CH radiator analogy'and, more important, the fact that I do it here, and it worksI think we're saying the same thing. I am not a plumber or heating engineer, but surely if I had for argument's sake a 10" element and a 20" element of the same rating, then the 20" element is going to distribute the energy into twice as much water therefore it would take twice as long (maybe not quite twice as long as the hot water from the longer element does rise) to heat the top 10" of water.
As above, it doesn't matter how much water is exposed to the element. The amount of (heat) energy transferred to the water will be the same, regardless of that, and, physics being physics, hotter water will always rise up to above colder water. If you feel a bottom-element cylinder (or CH radiator) after the heating has been 'on' (from cold) for a while, the top will be pretty hot, but the bottom (and places in-between) will remain pretty cold. That remains true (if starting from cold) for at least 30-60 mins with a cylinder, but less with a CH radiator (which contains much less water)That's the whole point in the shorter element, right? To focus the energy into a smaller area of water
Right.There's no need to discuss this theoretically,
Then presumably the top element would do that in (oh I don't know) 7 or 8 minutes.since I know how it works in practice. On the rare occasions when all the (heated overnight) hot water in my one-element cylinder gets used up (invariably when my daughters are hear and taking 'everlasting showers' ), if I switch on the (bottom element) useable amounts of hot water become available within about 15 minutes, probably less.
Interesting. That functionality might suit some users, but only if they only required the amount of hot water heated by the top element (until it's 'stat switched it off) and were happy for the water reverting to being cold thereafter..... plumbers merchants around here quite a few years back, use to stock a "one shot switch", such an item switch the supply for the heater L on dependant upon whether the stat was calling and you pressed the button, once the stat was satisfied then it switched off and stayed off until the button was pressed again, otherwise it stayed off.
Why do you think that? As I've said, virtually all of the heated water will rise to be at the top, very quickly, whether it is heated near the top or near the bottom. Are you perhaps thinking that 'heat rising' is a slow process (which it isn't) ?Then presumably the top element would do that in (oh I don't know) 7 or 8 minutes.
A 3 kW 'top element' will not heat water any quicker than will a 3 kW 'bottom element'. Even with the bottom element, the heated water will rise to the top of the cylinder, and will hence be available 'immediately' to be drawn off and used (from the top of the cylinder) just as quickly as it would with a 'top element'.
I see where you're coming from, but as the hot water rises through the cylinder from the bottom it will definitely dissipate heat into the surrounding body of water on its way to the top. I understand it will be hottest at the top though.Why do you think that? As I've said, virtually all of the heated water will rise to be at the top, very quickly, whether it is heated near the top or near the bottom. Are you perhaps thinking that 'heat rising' is a slow process (which it isn't) ?
What you're saying could only be correct if, with a bottom element, significant amounts of heated water remained below the level of the top element and, given that 'warmer water rises', that is not what Mr Physics says.
I've agreed that it is 'not strictly true' but am saying that, in practice, the difference is pretty small - such that, if I were the OP, I would not go to the cost and disruption of getting a new cylinder and an extra immersion (in practice, probably two new immersions) to achieve what he wants.Not strictly true, because whilst stratification is still in evidence, with a lower element there is much more mixing. Basically - if you want a small quantity, quickly, then a high level element really is the best way to produce that.
I think it probably could but, to the best of my knowledge, such animals don't exist. In their absence, one can achieve the same by switching off (manually, or automatically after a timed period) the bottom element after ithas resuklted in enough hot water appearing at the top of the cylinder.I'm sure if that were not true, then the same effect could more cheaply be reproduced, by simply using one element, by wired in series with a choice of two stat lengths.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local