Two tier moderating.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn't realise it was that thread. I thought it was the one which got locked about the Labour councillor. I've never been banned. Do they ever let you back on? Maybe everyone could agree to start a new thread about Gaza?
Not everyone gets banned.

I wonder why filly seems to get banned a lot.

Actually I don't wonder, its fairly obvious
 
Sponsored Links
I've no idea. But it seems a bit pointless have a discussion about Gaza without one of the main contributors from the other side of the debate.
I'm sure he doesn't get banned from following the rules.

It must be breaking the rules. He should know them by now though.
 
Sponsored Links
I'm sure he doesn't get banned from following the rules.

It must be breaking the rules. He should know them by now though.

Are the rules clear and are they applied consistently. Do you know why he was banned. I went back through the last few pages and nothing struck me as bad. Were there other posts which were deleted.
 
Are the rules clear and are they applied consistently. Do you know why he was banned. I went back through the last few pages and nothing struck me as bad. Were there other posts which were deleted.
No idea why specifically this time.

I'm sure he knows why, he might say
 
I certainly don't find it any fun if nobody with a different view joins in. That's the whole point of a discussion forum.

Filly has already broken the rules in this thread, if it happens often enough then it seems like the mods take action. Cut and dried...
 
Well, an initial post expressing my disappointment at not being allowed to post on the Armageddon thread, followed by 16 pages of racists desperately and unsuccessfully trying to justify their racism, and then I just popped by after that to say hello, and maybe suggested that having a Moderator with beliefs closely aligned with terror groups is maybe not such a good idea.

Who's breaking the rules?

Carry on chaps.
You are, you're breaking the rules of polite society at the very least by making unproven accusations.
Unless you'd like to present the proof that your accusations are not mendacious.
 
Filly doesn’t like people talking about the appalling atrocities Netanyahus govt and military have inflicted on Palestinians.

Filly hates Palestinians he applauds their slaughter
 
Filly doesn’t like people talking about the appalling atrocities Netanyahus govt and military have inflicted on Palestinians.

Filly hates Palestinians he applauds their slaughter

Notch is a supporter of racism.

1723581252787.png
 
That card is designed as a mickey take of those (Israeli, Jews and Gentiles) who claim that criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism.
It's not. And while some people claim it is they need to be educated. :rolleyes:
If they feel insulted by the truth, they shouldn't make spurious claims or accusations.
But they are still a subset of Israelis or Jews or Gentiles, and the Race Hate laws don't apply to a subset of nation or citizenry.

It's the Holocaust reference that will push it beyond the legal boundaries and the boundaries of decency.

If you feel it's OK to 'take the mickey' out of the fact 6 million jews were slaughtered. You are one sick MF.
 
Notch is a supporter of racism.

View attachment 352127
The Israelis are committing genocide, in my opinion. They are also, without question, dispossessing Palestinians of their land.
They have without doubt been operating an apartheid system for many years.
Sorry if that offends your sensitivities. Of course, they couldn't possibly do that without some Jews in the IDF.
So John's comment is perfectly accurate.
 
It's the Holocaust reference that will push it beyond the legal boundaries and the boundaries of decency.
Show us the law that says we can't use the word 'Holocaust'.

If you feel it's OK to 'take the mickey' out of the fact 6 million jews were slaughtered. You are one sick MF.
I don't feel it's OK, and as far as I am aware no-one has, so you can now retract your abuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top