- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,883
- Reaction score
- 2,360
- Country
UFO's / UAP's ?
- Thread starter Dork Lard
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 221031
As I predicted pages ago you’d go childish and petulant once you’d lost- Again.
I wouldn’t post if I was you. It’s not like anyone thanks you for your Google skills.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,883
- Reaction score
- 2,360
- Country
Well respected author.
Science Journals - Papers written by Joel Mann Williams
GS Journal is your leading platform for high quality science journals, scientific papers and peer-reviewed full-text journals /> <meta name=
www.gsjournal.net
"Based on the chemistry of minerals, Petrie's "Infamous Core #7" is shown to have been produced easily by milling techniques far less advanced than those espoused to exceed modern milling technology."
Refute it if you want.
D
Deleted member 221031
You’ve taken that out of context. The crux of the matter is core 7 was drilled continuously, which isn’t possible with a back and forth bow drill. As explained below.Well respected author.
Science Journals - Papers written by Joel Mann Williams
GS Journal is your leading platform for high quality science journals, scientific papers and peer-reviewed full-text journals /> <meta name=
"Based on the chemistry of minerals, Petrie's "Infamous Core #7" is shown to have been produced easily by milling techniques far less advanced than those espoused to exceed modern milling technology."
Refute it if you want.
Quantum Frequency Healing ♾️ on TikTok
Take a look at this incredible piece of technology from Ancient Egypt: the mysterious grooves in Petrie's Core 7! #ancientegypt #advancedtechnology #petrie #score #bowdrill #reconstruction #mystery #groove #technology @qicoil
Is he ?
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,883
- Reaction score
- 2,360
- Country
No, it says exactly this no more, no less,
"Based on the chemistry of minerals, Petrie's "Infamous Core #7" is shown to have been produced easily by milling techniques far less advanced than those espoused to exceed modern milling technology."
Refute it if you want.
D
Deleted member 221031
Scroll to the bottom. Petrie vindicated.
D
Deleted member 221031
We have even started with Egypt and you’re looking for straws again.
D
Deleted member 221031
I’m not sure what Angle you think you’re working. But the earth is a globe. Unless you can prove differently?
D
Deleted member 221031
That’s not what it says and you know it.
But let’s give you the benefit of the doubt. Are we taking the 4 page rambles of a chemist as evidence now ? A quote from his paper.
Being a chemist who has built houses and concrete culverts, generated polymeric materials, run saws, lattes and milling machines, the wider material removal at the top and the wider taper of the center core at the bottom did not appear to me to be high-tech stuff. When I showed it to my wife (a scientist without machining experience, but who has lots of culinary experience, including cookie cutting), she instantly noted that the opposing slants of the main block and that the core did not make sense to her! So, what follows is an advanced, primitive method for producing "Petrie's Core #7"
Sorry I missed his wife’s culinary experience!! That’s a game changer right there.
We therefore need have no hesitation in allowing that the graving out of lines in hard stones by jewel points, was a well-known art. And when we find on the surfaces of the saw-cuts in diorite, grooves as deep as 1/100 inch, it appears far more likely that such were produced by fixed jewel points in the saw, than by any fortuitous rubbing about of a loose powder. And when, further, it is seen that these deep grooves are almost always regular and uniform in depth, and equidistant, their production by the successive cuts of the jewel-teeth of a saw appears to be beyond question. The best examples of equidistance are the specimens of basalt No.4 , and of diorite No.12; in these the fluctuations are no more than such as always occur in the use of a saw by hand-power, whether worked in wood or in soft stone.
On the granite core, broken from a drill-hole (No.7), other features appear, which also can only be explained by the use of fixed jewel points. Firstly, the grooves which run around it form a regular spiral, with no more interruption or waviness than is necessarily produced by the variations in the component crystals ; this spiral is truly symmetrical with the axis of the core. In one part a groove can be traced, with scarcely an interruption, for a length of four turns. Secondly, the grooves are as deep in the quartz as in the adjacent felspar, and even rather deeper. If these were in any way produced by loose powder, they would be shallower in the harder substance quartz ; whereas a fixed jewel point would be compelled to plough to the same depth in all the components; and further, inasmuch as the quartz stands out slightly beyond the felspar (owing to the latter being worn by general rubbing), the groove was thus left even less in depth on the felspar than on the quartz. Thus, even if specimens with similarly deep grooves could be produced by a loose powder, the special features of this core would still show that fixed cutting points were the means here employed.
That the blades of the saws were of bronze, we know from the green staining on the sides of saw cuts, and on grains of sand left in a saw cut.
The forms of the tools were straight saws, circular saws, tubular drills, and lathes.
extract from The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh by W. M. Flinders Petrie
Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,883
- Reaction score
- 2,360
- Country
Yes, we know what Chris Dunn thinks. He's wrong and I have shown you how.
There is a video, which you claim not be able to open, which shows how the Egyptians did it. It is there, right in front of your very eyes, and proves Chris Dunn conclusively wrong. If you still claim it can't be done then I really can't help you with that.
There is a paper from a well respected scientific author that explains the theory of how it can easily be done with the tools Egyptians had at the time (citing other scientific authors who have studied the nature of rocks/granite). If you still claim it can't be done then I really can't help you with that.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,883
- Reaction score
- 2,360
- Country
I showed you a screenshot of the actual quote, in full, and you claim it doesn't say that? You need to give your head a shake.
D
Deleted member 221031
He’s not expert, his wife clearly know as much as him. You can’t expect that to be taken seriously?
So we won’t take the words of experts in the field. But a chemist/diy home builder and his wife the accomplished cook ?
- Status
Sponsored Links
