Was watching a tv prog the other night 'when buildings collapse' quite interesting. The prog focused on this tragic incident:
However, there was also a section of the prog given over to (global) concerns about our aging housing stock. A survey had been done of UK housing stock and quite a high % was deemed to be of poor/very poor and even dangerous structural condition. They focused in on Glasgow and the aging tenements, now well in excess of 100 years old. Many of them showing significant structural issues that will cost more to put right than owners can afford. The prog asserted there needs to be an accelerated conversation/debate about existing housing stock with a defined strategy as to how buildings that are near (or at) end of useful life will be repaired or demolished and replaced.
It got me thinking about the cookie-cutter houses that are thrown up these days, often with huge snagging lists from the outset. I think these are designed/built with a 50 year lifespan before major works might be required on them? Not that long in real terms.
Would be interested to know what others thoughts are on this whether referring to older or newer buildings.
Surfside condominium collapse - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
However, there was also a section of the prog given over to (global) concerns about our aging housing stock. A survey had been done of UK housing stock and quite a high % was deemed to be of poor/very poor and even dangerous structural condition. They focused in on Glasgow and the aging tenements, now well in excess of 100 years old. Many of them showing significant structural issues that will cost more to put right than owners can afford. The prog asserted there needs to be an accelerated conversation/debate about existing housing stock with a defined strategy as to how buildings that are near (or at) end of useful life will be repaired or demolished and replaced.
It got me thinking about the cookie-cutter houses that are thrown up these days, often with huge snagging lists from the outset. I think these are designed/built with a 50 year lifespan before major works might be required on them? Not that long in real terms.
Would be interested to know what others thoughts are on this whether referring to older or newer buildings.