UN Charter on refugees.

Status
Not open for further replies.
However can you tell me how we can expedite their asylum claims?
Due process. Or perhaps, a better answer, well designed, and better cooperation in that due process.
An EU wide coordinated approach.

How do we stop them becoming refugees?
I assume you mean, "how do we stop creating refugees"?
That is another subject entirely. I was merely concerned with refuting and disproving urban mythology with this thread.
 
Sponsored Links
Is this the new charter they're pushing that not many countries have signed up to ?

You mean the one voted in December. 181 countries voted for it and 3 abstained.

Its non binding so even if you vote for it you don't need to implement it.
 
The Dublin Regulation establishes the Member State responsible for the examination of the asylum application
See post number 12.
It mentions absolutely nothing about a requirement for a refugee to claim asylum in any specific country.
It also only refers to the country in which the refugee is first registered.​

So, not only does it not support the urban mythology, it emphatically refutes it!​

It also emphatically supports the principle that a refugee cannot be immediately relocated to another destination, until their claim is processed.​

Read more: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/un-charter-on-refugees.515336/#ixzz5bAHgxsJF
 
Sponsored Links
But has it been agreed & ratified & put in to force ?
Force?

It is an irrelevance.
See post number 12, repeated in post number 19.
It mentions absolutely nothing about a requirement for a refugee to claim asylum in any specific country.
It also only refers to the country in which the refugee is first registered.

So, not only does it not support the urban mythology, pedaled by Vinty and others, it emphatically refutes it!

It also emphatically supports the principle that a refugee cannot be immediately relocated to another destination, until their claim is processed.

Read more: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/un-charter-on-refugees.515336/#ixzz5bAHgxsJF
 
That applies after the claim for asylum has been processed and rejected, not on the point of a refugee arriving.
Or it applies for someone wishing to immigrate to UK. The clue is in the title:
Immigration Act 2014

OK don't read it then.

The problem with reading the pdf versions rather than the online versions, is you miss all the amendments and repeals. So you might happily rely on the text only to find a whole chunk of it is no longer law - e.g. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/13/contents Sec 2.

It actually makes quite a difference.
 
Force?

It is an irrelevance.
See post number 12, repeated in post number 19.
It mentions absolutely nothing about a requirement for a refugee to claim asylum in any specific country.
It also only refers to the country in which the refugee is first registered.

So, not only does it not support the urban mythology, pedaled by Vinty and others, it emphatically refutes it!

It also emphatically supports the principle that a refugee cannot be immediately relocated to another destination, until their claim is processed.

Read more: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/un-charter-on-refugees.515336/#ixzz5bAHgxsJF
I asked about the meeting in Morocco, have the new resolutions been agreed, and put into place ?
 
OK don't read it then.

The problem with reading the pdf versions rather than the online versions, is you miss all the amendments and repeals. So you might happily rely on the text only to find a whole chunk of it is no longer law - e.g. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/13/contents Sec 2.

It actually makes quite a difference.
You have now referred to a completely different Act
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006
(the one that I initially referred to, and you suggested I look at a different Act)
than the one you initially referred to.

Immigration Act 2014
See the difference?
Therefore your sarcastic comment about

"OK don't read it then.
The problem with reading the pdf versions rather than the online versions, is you miss all the amendments and repeals. So you might happily rely on the text only to find a whole chunk of it is no longer law"
is tantamount to insulting.
If that is what you feel the need to descend into, so be it.

Additionally, the latest Act that you refer to, is in fact an older Act than the one you originally referred to.
Therefore we can assume that the original, that I did read, supersedes the one that you now refer to.

It looks like you are running round in circles desperately looking for something to support Vinty's urban mythology.

Keep looking.
 
Last edited:
From the European parliament:

Currently third-country nationals must apply for protection in the first EU country they enter. Filing a claim means that they become asylum applicants (or asylum seekers). They receive refugee status or a different form of international protection only once a positive decision has been made by national authorities

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/...9STO78630/eu-migrant-crisis-facts-and-figures
 
The Immigration Act 2014 amends the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
 
From the European parliament:

Currently third-country nationals must apply for protection in the first EU country they enter. Filing a claim means that they become asylum applicants (or asylum seekers). They receive refugee status or a different form of international protection only once a positive decision has been made by national authorities

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/...9STO78630/eu-migrant-crisis-facts-and-figures
How can you apply that if they don't register?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top