Veiled contributors.

[EFLImpudence]

 

[Brigade77]

The easiset way to expose a sock puppet is to engage it's persona in a disagreement.

Who backs it up ?

You need to do this just enougth times & it becomes clear exactly who controls which sock.

I've been doing it for years & amazingly . . . but possibly not here . . . most of a forums traffic is usually from the forum owner.

Another good way is to simply 'hack' the logs of the forum software & follow the IP's. I've never done this personally but the 'how to's' are readily available if you know where to look

 

[CylonRaider]

Well I think I already posted a pic of me (When I were a nipper) so here's a vid... of me ...Now !!

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Another good way is to simply 'hack' the logs of the forum software & follow the IP's. I've never done this personally but the 'how to's' are readily available if you know where to look

Seeing as I am worth about 1/tinyteenth of what you are, also puter illiterate, thus requiring charitable help, could you you post some links for "us" to find out how to hack these things??

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Well I think I already posted a pic of me (When I were a nipper) so here's a vid... of me ...Now !!

I saw yah! Right hand side of the dash about 0.13. You're no tatty ted but much more hench than noseall!

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

As I said earlier, it is behaviour such as this:

that encourages many to hide their personal details.
When such long-term members exploit the slightest personal detail in their troll-like behaviour, and sink to such depths of obscene depravity, it makes sense to not disclose any personal details whatsoever.
Such behaviour, especially from long-term members sets the culture and tone of these boards.
In setting the tone and culture of these forums, such long-term members probably discourage many more professionals and experts from participation in these forums. That can only be damaging to the site. It is impossible to perceive how such breaches of professional etiquette might be beneficial.

 

[blightymam]

As I said earlier, it is behaviour such as this:
View attachment 114972
that encourages many to hide their personal details.
When such long-term members exploit the slightest personal detail in their troll-like behaviour, and sink to such depths of obscene depravity, it makes sense to not disclose any personal details whatsoever.
Such behaviour, especially from long-term members sets the culture and tone of these boards.
In setting the tone and culture of these forums, such long-term members probably discourage many more professionals and experts from participation in these forums. That can only be damaging to the site. It is impossible to perceive how such breaches of professional etiquette might be beneficial.

When a thread is locked, it's not good to drag your argument onto another - unless you want to get another thread locked Himmy? It does seem to be your modus operandi.

Smile/snap. So sad Himmy.

Please do not carry our spat onto the other threads. I have not done so!

 

[Brigadier]

As I said earlier, it is behaviour such as this:
View attachment 114972
that encourages many to hide their personal details.
When such long-term members exploit the slightest personal detail in their troll-like behaviour, and sink to such depths of obscene depravity.......

Really? How do you cope in the real world?

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Really? How do you cope in the real world?

Just because there are bad things happening elsewhere, that is no justification for replicating that bad behaviour in other spheres. In fact, quite the reverse, we should seek to NOT replicate bad behaviour, especially when it entails poor professional etiquette, on what is supposedly a site to seek expert opinion. It should be the long-term members who should set the tone and culture of sites such as this.

 

[Brigadier]

Just because there are bad things happening elsewhere, that is no justification for replicating that bad behaviour in other spheres. In fact, quite the reverse, we should seek to NOT replicate bad behaviour, especially when it entails poor professional etiquette, on what is supposedly a site to seek expert opinion. It should be the long-term members who should set the tone and culture of sites such as this.

A very long-winded reply, while holding onto a completely different stick.....

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Really? How do you cope in the real world?

Just because there are bad things happening elsewhere, that is no justification for replicating that bad behaviour in other spheres. ....

You do not see the connection and the extension of the same discussion?

 

[blightymam]

Just because there are bad things happening elsewhere, that is no justification for replicating that bad behaviour in other spheres. In fact, quite the reverse, we should seek to NOT replicate bad behaviour, especially when it entails poor professional etiquette, on what is supposedly a site to seek expert opinion. It should be the long-term members who should set the tone and culture of sites such as this.

So you've been here, what, around 10 years Himmy? And you tell people that they have bad behaviour?
Have all these people you're telling off been banned as many times as you?
Do you have such low self-awareness that you cannot see your posts that complain about other's behaviour continually highlight your own?

Some examples. Please look at the amount of name-calling, lowering the tone and basic trolling behaviour that you show on a daily basis. Then have a good, hard look in the mirror and practice what you preach. We can all see that you're a silly silly hypocrite, shame you are so conceited that you do not see it in yourself. This forum really is better without you in it.

It is not my opinion that makes you the ****, it is your juvenile attitude and behaviour

Perhaps they are your relatives that you referred to, halfwit relatives

It really depends on where you are in the world, who you’re talking to, and how much you filter what dribbles out of your brain before it escapes your mouth as to how far your head is stuck up your ass at the moment."
I see there is an unusual amount that dribbles out of your brain and escapes your mouth.

You are no longer merely a man of no substance and no integrity, but now an obscene, disgusting man of no substance and no integrity.

You are too stupid, too dishonorable, too obscene, too egotistical for anyone to want you as a relative, except for your halfwit relatives. They might enjoy your obscene company.

You are a complete and total buffoon! A disgusting and obscene buffoon at that!

Relative Humidity compared to Relative Stupidity

Let us replace woody’s head for the air that we want to compare Relative Humidity. Then let us take ‘fake news and silly ideas’ as a replacement for moisture.


Now if we take woody’s head and completely empty it (it may already be completely empty, it may be full of egomania.) but we need to ensure that it is empty.

Then we take several pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’.

Now we cool woody’s head down to 7.5 ° C (it’s an arbitrary temperature but you will see why soon. Some of the more astute may be way ahead of me.)

Let us see how much ‘fake news and silly ideas’ we can cram into woody’s head before it becomes saturated, at 7.5 ° C.

Suppose we can cram one whole page of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into his head, at 7.5 ° C until it can take no more. If we try to cram any more in, it just spews out of his orifices. (I will call this woody’s spew point. )

We can call this 100% Woody’s Relative Stupidity level at 7.5 ° C.

Now, obviously, when we were cramming ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into his head, when we had crammed in just half of a page that was 50% woody’s Relative Stupidity levels at 7.5 °C

If we then warm woody’s head up by ten degrees to 17.5 ° C, then we will see if we can cram any more ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into his head.

Wow! We can. We can cram another whole page of ‘fake news and silly ideas’, on top of the first page, into woody’s head.

We have now doubled the amount of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into woody’s head.

If we continue, by warming his head up by another ten degrees, to 27.5°, we find we can now cram a further two pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into woody’s head. Doubling the amount that was already there. There is now four pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ in woody’s head.

Each time we reach saturation point, we call that 100% woody’s Relative Stupidity level.

Finally we warm woody’s head up by a further ten degrees to 37.5 ° C. (We know woody is normally hot headed, but let us stick with normality for now).

We find that we can now cram in a further four pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ into his head. That is now eight pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ that we have managed to cram in, by warming his head up. When we could only manage to cram in one page when his head was at 7.5 ° C.


Now his head is at 37.5 ° C, and with eight pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’, what happens when we cool his head back down to, say 27.5 ° C. Let us try it.

Wow, four pages of ‘fake news and silly ideas’ spews out of his head. We called this the woody’s spew point.


All of this is directly comparable to air and moisture, where the air is represented by woody’s head, and the moisture is represented by ‘fake news and silly ideas’.

Edit: Oops forgot: Any questions?

In your own words:

You do not see the connection ?

 

[Brigadier]

You do not see the connection and the extension of the same discussion?

A shorter version of "I haven't a clue". Let's hope you're cottoning on to the attraction of brevity.

Or, "I don't want to discuss this, so I'll divert to what i want to yak about, instead".

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Some examples. Please look at the amount of name-calling, lowering the tone and basic trolling behaviour that you show on a daily basis.

I fully accept that my behaviour has been bad and thoroughly unprofessional. But I make no apology for it concerning my comments towards woody.
My initial reaction to his unwarranted and unsupported accusation of plagiarism was one of indignation. I deleted my comments and cancelled my registration, thereby withdrawing from any further discussion and severing any possible connection with my professional reputation.

My singular objective in returning to the site was to attempt to goad woody into retracting his accusation or providing some evidence that would support his accusation. He chose not to do the former and I knew he could not succeed on the latter.
I even offered him a further honorable course of action, he still refused to consider that possibility. He preferred to respond with insults, reaching to depths of obscene depravity.
I consider that a complete breach of professional conduct and a level of behaviour utterly unbecoming of any self-pronounced professional. His attitude and behaviour must discourage any other professionals or experts, or even willing volunteers, to become involved on the site.
I would suggest that woody needs to have a good long hard look at himself and his acceptable standard of professional conduct.

If you seek to support his unprofessional conduct, then I would suggest that you also need to reconsider.

Because of his unprofessional attitude I will not be contributing any further advice on these boards. I will however continue with my singular objective to remind woody of his unprofessional attitude and his responsibility to set acceptable standards in these forums.
In the meantime I consider my right to participate in other discussions. If you seek to deny me that right, which you appear to be suggesting, because you disagree with my opinions, you also have that right. Whether it comes to fruition, we await the outcome.

 

[Brigadier]

You only came back to goad Woody. Your "singular objective". Your words.
And repeated.

You then state in the same post that you will continue to participate in other discussions.

What a tizz you're in!