Hi Adrian,
To be honest, I don't think any of us care whether you are a Phd in electronics or just another guy, like us, who is prepared to have a go, so don't put yourself down.. you're worth more than that.
Sometimes, a bit of a scorch mark can be simply due to a heatsink getting too hot. That said, it's not a good sign. None of us could say for certain what it means without actually seeing it. If, however, it is the voltage regulator or any component part of the power supply then things do not look good.
Although it is not a visionary idea to place the control panel in the hot water tank cupboard, it is done on occasion with no problems. As long as it's a fair distance from the tank itself and, of course, away from the hot pipes.
Due to your finding a scorch mark on the board, there is every possibility that someone is going to suggest that you change the panel immediately. I don't like doing this until I have seen the problem, if it is one, for myself. At the end of the day, I am trying to save you money. If we can avoid paying for a new panel then that's alright by me.
The reason I specifically asked you to carry out the tests in a previous post was to determine once and for all whether a battery fault has caused irreperable damage to the control panel. There is a general consensus of opinion that you have a battery fault, I don't disagree with the comments, they make sense, but I have not proven that yet to my own satisfaction.
I should repeat however, that a battery fault can lead to damage to the control panel. It is possible that the scorch marks you see are due to such a fault. But ... it is not proven, and the only way we are going to find out is if you carry out the tests which I have outlined above. i.e. Link tests. From what you say, I have every confidence that you are able to test this panel.
There are other reasons for testing the panel before going out to buy a new one. First and foremost, the faults which appear to be emanating from the panel may well be due to a fault at any one of the devices including the bell. Changing a panel in this case would mean that you are still stuck with the fault and a spare panel.
I must confess that at this point it is not looking good for the panel, and as others have suggested, nor the battery. However, I don't know how other engineers go about resolving problems but I base all my decisions on evidence. I need evidence before I am able to make a categoric statement. I can only adduce that evidence if certain tests are performed.
If the scenario is such that a mere 7 year old panel has bitten the dust, then I believe your choice of panel should be close to the one you have now. Perhaps something like a 9448 with remote (if there is one !!), a texecom or a castle. The guys on the site have their own preferences so we'll let them decide what is best. As for lifespan, perhaps I should insert that my panel was installed in 1994 without a day's problem. I don't bother with it, except to change the battery every three years. Detectors should last a minimum of ten years, my detectors, chosen off the shelf and nothing special, are still going strong and the most they have had is a feather duster once a year.
You owe it to yourself to perform a 'Link test' before you go any further, but the decision is yours. If a link test proves satisfactory then we would need to test the battery, there is a very simple way of doing this without electronic test equipment, but we'll go there when we need to.
Let the forum know how you are getting on and what you decide.
Take Care.