It won't stop the RWR religious morons from trying.They will not succeed...
It won't stop the RWR religious morons from trying.They will not succeed...
Complications during pregnancy can kill women, not pregnancy itself.Pregnancy can kill women
Reducing the gestation period is probably irrelevant or moot but might be proposed along side some more beneficial measures. Simply to get all sides interested. I doubt the gestation cut off will be reduced by any meaningful amount, like they have done in the fruit loop states in the US.What is so perfect about the current system that changes can't be discussed?
2.1 Currently, the requirement for two doctors to certify that a woman meets the legal grounds for abortion has the potential to delay treatment. It may be difficult for a woman who is concerned about confidentiality to find two doctors to approve her abortion request. There is no central monitoring of delays to treatment of this type, but recently, Tony Calland, the Medical Ethics Committee Chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) said that "some women waited up to 13 weeks [gestation] to have their abortion approved by two doctors and removing this requirement would reduce such a wait and the associated risks". The requirement for two signatures for solely legal purposes also increases treatment costs by introducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
4.3 Recent public opinion polls suggest that the public would like to see improved and easier access for early abortion but that the upper limit should be reduced or that later abortions should be subject to greater counselling and stricter approval criteria. The BMA, the RCOG the Nuffield Council on Bioethics have addressed the problems surrounding later abortion.
4.5 In practice, it would seem reasonable to reduce the 24 week upper limit for section 1(1)a C and D abortions to 16 weeks. Abortions could still be approved over 16 weeks under section 1(1)a Ground B where the termination is necessary top prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the women. Agreement to such abortions would follow improved in-depth counselling and a concerted effort to confirm that there is a risk of grave injury. (No limits would be placed on abortions sanctioned under Grounds A and E).
84. The Abortion Act 1967 requires that an abortion under ground A to E is certified by two doctors, who must each sign a Department of Health HSA 1 form to give notification that the abortion has been approved and on what grounds, and an HSA 4 form for information including patient details, the method of abortion and gestation time.
And safer for the women. But don't let that get in the way of a male religious fruit loop and his hatred of women.Its cheaper to encourage women to kill off their kids before they are born.
I've asked you before, I'll ask again.Complications during pregnancy can kill women, not pregnancy itself.
Most women dont have abortions to save their lives, they have them to get rid of an unwanted child.
The state is complicit in this act because it doesn't want the burden of disabled and abandoned children.
Its cheaper to encourage women to kill off their kids before they are born.
No it will not - but even with a loaded SC the anti-abortion lobby will persist in using arcane litigation in order to clog up the courts and maintain a public profile on the issue. Democrats will push the pro-choice message hard as the election digs in to Fall.It won't stop the RWR religious morons from trying.
All cases are individual just like the child that is aborted.What right do you have to impose your views on any woman's case without any facts
incorrect - the cooling off period was dropped in 2015
Edit: I stand corrected - the 2 consultations are required, not 1.
So you have no facts but can make decisions for all the women Involved.All cases are individual just like the child that is aborted.
There may be exceptions where termination of a pregnancy may be necessary but most abortions are not those exceptions.
However abortion today is used as a form of birth control.
So you accept that the killing of unborn children simply because of disability or lifestyle reasons is ok.And safer for the women
A bit typical of some august body sitting around a table jawing and looking for problems. So find some proof that the delay is due to the 2 docs aspect. An abortion clinic is set up to work that way. Use a GP - does a referral count as an approval. Pass. In some respects given the allowed reasons for an abortion it could. The GP would just need to discuss that. Some might have religious objections so another would need to be found. The usual main reasons for an abortion being allowed boil down to an unwanted baby. The baby all being ok will be around for a long time which takes care of that aspect - long term effect on the mother or even other children in the family.2.1 Currently, the requirement for two doctors to certify that a woman meets the legal grounds for abortion has the potential to delay treatment. It may be difficult for a woman who is concerned about confidentiality to find two doctors to approve her abortion request. There is no central monitoring of delays to treatment of this type, but recently, Tony Calland, the Medical Ethics Committee Chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) said that "some women waited up to 13 weeks [gestation] to have their abortion approved by two doctors and removing this requirement would reduce such a wait and the associated risks". The requirement for two signatures for solely legal purposes also increases treatment costs by introducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
The facts are that abortion kills a child.So you have no facts but can make decisions for all the women Involved.
You are still missing the point that until 1991, irrelevant of what the abortion act 1967 said, there were only two criteria that made abortion legal. The child was not viable or it was done in good faith for the purpose only of preserving the life of the mother.
Imagine a viable Foetus in 1980:
The bar was substantially lowered..
Does that mean if they don't have the consultations, they can't have an abortion?
Yes. It's up to the woman. If she does not want to have a child, so be it.So you accept that the killing of unborn children simply because of disability or lifestyle reasons is ok.