Bernard - please - stop trying to make out that lights not working properly could be as much of an emergency to anybody as would suddenly finding yourself the only person still standing on a boat out at sea, or having an artery severed.
Maybe not, but it (lights being taken out by faults on other circuits) is easily the most common reason that electricians cite for their belief that 314 requires circuits to be split across at last two RCDs. I've never heard of anyone worrying that a fault in a cooker could take out the immersion, or that a fault in a sockets circuit could take out the shower, but some of them sure do worry about other circuits taking out all of the lighting!Bernard - please - stop trying to make out that lights not working properly could be as much of an emergency to anybody as would suddenly finding yourself the only person still standing on a boat out at sea, or having an artery severed.
Obviously BAS has never had a situation that invoked a panic attack in a domestic situtation.Bernard - please - stop trying to make out that lights not working properly could be as much of an emergency to anybody as would suddenly finding yourself the only person still standing on a boat out at sea, or having an artery severed.
Indeed not - you don't have time, as you have all these straws to clutch at.I am sure there is some reading matter about the matter. Not that I am going to look for it.
Indeed, and that is a perfectly reasonable factor to consider when doing the design.Maybe not, but it (lights being taken out by faults on other circuits) is easily the most common reason that electricians cite for their belief that 314 requires circuits to be split across at last two RCDs. I've never heard of anyone worrying that a fault in a cooker could take out the immersion, or that a fault in a sockets circuit could take out the shower, but some of them sure do worry about other circuits taking out all of the lighting!
Going back to how this all started, I do not think that the issue is about the direness of the emergency but, rather, about the 'immediacy' of the problem that needs to be solved. Someone who has managed to kill his/her lighting is not going to go away and study several books/whatever in order to get his/her lights back on again!It does not mean that being without lights, or being without ones which switch on and off properly, is an emergency of the same stature as bleeding heavily or finding yourself in charge of a boat out at sea.
Yes, we know that's your view, but is it not the case that "blindly following instructions without understanding [the reason for] them" is precisely what many/most people do when they receive advice from a healthcare professional, lawyer, accountant, financial advisor etc. etc.?There are no extenuating circumstances - uninformed fiddling and experimenting and blindly following instructions without understanding them are not, and never will be, acceptable.
I never suggested any of those things. I was merely responding to your assertion that "blindly following instructions without understanding them" was "unacceptable", by indicating that such is precisely what most of us do when acting on advice from experts/specialists, in a vast range of fields.And you think that those "analogies" are applicable to someone who chooses to do electrical installation work without knowing what they are doing? You think that learning how lighting circuits work is a task as demanding as becoming a nurse, doctor, lawyer, accountant?
One could be a highly competent, skilled and experienced aircraft fitter, able to 'do things as instructed' impeccably, yet be totally incapable of doing a calculation of any sort, whether in relation to electrical cables, aircraft design or anything else.You think that working out a cable size is as complex as building or maintaining aircraft and spaceships?
I never realised that you have difficulties which mean that you are unable to understand that the context of "blindly following instructions without understanding them" is DIY domestic electrical work.I never suggested any of those things. I was merely responding to your assertion that "blindly following instructions without understanding them" was "unacceptable", by indicating that such is precisely what most of us do when acting on advice from experts/specialists, in a vast range of fields.
But I have realised that your inability to understand the difference in scope between installing light switches or sizing a cable for a shed or a shower and building or maintaining or designing aircraft means that it is pointless trying to explain it to you.One could be a highly competent, skilled and experienced aircraft fitter, able to 'do things as instructed' impeccably, yet be totally incapable of doing a calculation of any sort, whether in relation to electrical cables, aircraft design or anything else.
Maybe not, but it (lights being taken out by faults on other circuits) is easily the most common reason that electricians cite for their belief that 314 requires circuits to be split across at last two RCDs. I've never heard of anyone worrying that a fault in a cooker could take out the immersion, or that a fault in a sockets circuit could take out the shower, but some of them sure do worry about other circuits taking out all of the lighting!Bernard - please - stop trying to make out that lights not working properly could be as much of an emergency to anybody as would suddenly finding yourself the only person still standing on a boat out at sea, or having an artery severed.
Kind Regards, John
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local