Tony Benn: the Lord who became a Lad. What quote from him do you have to enlighten us upon your path, Grasshopper?Your not listening are you I've edited my post to what Tony Benn which might lead you to the path I'm on.
Morning.
Tony Benn: the Lord who became a Lad. What quote from him do you have to enlighten us upon your path, Grasshopper?Your not listening are you I've edited my post to what Tony Benn which might lead you to the path I'm on.
Morning.
Isn't there a general election next year?
Now you're quoting a looney-left trope from 15 years ago: you seem to take a pick-n-mix approach to political ideals - it's all very chewy but rather tasteless.If voting changed anything then you wouldn't be given the vote .....very profound.
You getting it yet (obviously not) when we had true labour conservative liberal parties we had a choice so why tear the system down?
Now we have an amalgamation of said parties that you can't get a cigarette paper between .....
It's as though they never learn.
You getting it yet (obviously not) when we had true labour conservative liberal parties we had a choice so why tear the system down?
Now we have an amalgamation of said parties that you can't get a cigarette paper between who are now disenfranchising Brexit voters.
It's as though they never learn.
Some brexiters like gant say this.It's obvious Farage sold out his voters (part of the establishment) and handed it over to the Tories to get it done, which was always going to end in tears (no belief in it) and so it's proved.
With backstabber in chief Rishi wielding the knife.
If voting changed anything then you wouldn't be given the vote .....very profound.
That's a lot of rubbish if you dont me mind me saying.Because, under the current system, you can't get much done unless you're in power.
To achieve power, you have to make your policies appealing to enough voters: otherwise, it is futile posturing.
That's why we need a different voting system: to give everyone a vote worth something, as well as clip the wings of extremist wings of any parties in power.
In your opinion.
And even if the above were the case - and I'm not getting into that here - that would be entirely logical: to win the game as it currently stands, you have to appeal to sufficient voters. And as those "sufficient voters" likely want basically the same thing, so the parties have to appeal to those same things.
But they have learned; that is why (if your claim is true) "you can't get a cigarette paper between them now".
If they hadn't learned, they'd still be the same parties you said they were, "when we had a choice".
.Must be a first you e got something right.Some brexiters like gant say this.
Others cheer on Boris for getting it done.
The 2 different views can't both be right
You can get inti power by ignoring a proportion of the electorate and they know it.
Ergo, not satisfactory to the smaller group of voters, who become of no consequence (to the result).To achieve power, you have to make your policies appealing to enough voters
And sufficient voters don't want boats turning up on our shores but has been shown they can't do f*ck all about it because of international laws and treaties and isn't that the nub of the problem our politicians are nothing more than glorified gatekeepers.
That's a lot of rubbish if you dont me mind me saying.