Apologies for misunderstanding.
I thought "That..." referred to what Brigadier wrote.
I thought "That..." referred to what Brigadier wrote.
No, but it would still be their opinion.If someone posts summat, albeit "their opinion" it will still garner a reaction is the content is provocative. You can't berate people for wanting to criticise or counter their opinion, if that opinion goes against the truth.
So you keep saying. What's your point?No, but it would still be their opinion.
No it wouldn't.No, but it would still be their opinion.
That some people wrongly disagree.So you keep saying. What's your point?No, but it would still be their opinion.
No it wouldn't.No, but it would still be their opinion.
I am heartened by your surprise.Wow, misrepresentation of a quote award goes to......EFLI!!! Well done bud. Care to quote all the wording in the post next time eh?
Are you saying it's wrong to disagree with an opinion?That some people wrongly disagree.
Well,Are you saying it's wrong to disagree with an opinion?That some people wrongly disagree.
Oh and can read the whole sentence and respond rather than just cherry pick individual portions of a sentence or post, in an attempt to be vague and clever. It's rather tiresome and disheartening.
He thinks he's top dog on this gd forum now since most of the smart interesting people have left. Quite amusing tbh. Think he's the bad one out the good the bad and the ugly.Well,Are you saying it's wrong to disagree with an opinion?That some people wrongly disagree.
Oh and can read the whole sentence and respond rather than just cherry pick individual portions of a sentence or post, in an attempt to be vague and clever. It's rather tiresome and disheartening.
One thing I used to like was your posts Noseall.
Always quite witty / funny / sarcastic, but amusing etc.
But I think you're being a bit hard here with EFL. I mean, compared to me, DJ, LMB etc, he's a reasonably balanced ok kinda guy...
Did you get out of bed the wrong side today?
Wrong time of the month? - you know, some Poles beat your quotes and you lost some work?..............
I sometimes wonder if we speak the same language.Are you saying it's wrong to disagree with an opinion?That some people wrongly disagree.
There wasn't any more:Oh and can read the whole sentence and respond rather than just cherry pick individual portions of a sentence or post, in an attempt to be vague and clever. It's rather tiresome and disheartening.
No it wouldn't.No, but it would still be their opinion.
You wrote it......I suppose it depends what you mean by wrong.
I'm interested to know why YOU think it's wrong.That some people wrongly disagree.
Who has ever said that someone's opinion is not their opinion?I sometimes wonder if we speak the same language.Are you saying it's wrong to disagree with an opinion?That some people wrongly disagree.
You asked me why - I kept saying that, even though wrong or stupid, their opinion would still be their opinion.
I replied and quoted - because others said their opinion would not still be their opinion.
Sometimes it may be morally right, expected and honourable to disagree with and discredit some opinions.Your next retort was - is it wrong to disagree?
I suppose it depends what you mean by wrong.
If one could give thanks (that has some reverential sound to it!) to a part of a post. I would have thanked you for part of your post. I might have just added a 'normally' reasonably balanced ok kinda guy.But I think you're being a bit hard here with EFL. I mean, compared to me, DJ, LMB etc, he's a reasonably balanced ok kinda guy...
FFS.Who has ever said that someone's opinion is not their opinion?
No it wouldn't.No, but it would still be their opinion.
BECAUSE THE OPINION IS THEIR OPINIONI'm interested to know why YOU think it's wrong.That some people wrongly disagree.
NO. I never said it was.Can you explain why it would be wrong to discredit, refute or argue against, an opinion?