If you are dealing with very fine dusts having a bag means that you just close the bag seal and drop it in the bin - without a bag you can end up getting covered in dust when you empty the cleaner. My missus insisted on having a Miele vacuum for the attic room and top stairs, partly because it uses a sealable bag - it is a far less onerous task to change the bags on that than it is to empty the downstairs Dyson. Just saying. Bags do tend to increase the running costs quite a bit, thoughQUESTION: why would you want a vacuum with a bag?
Is the pain of having to have a bag worth it? ,,
It may have better filters, who knows? Surely one of the things you pay for in a better vacuum is the filters - both in filter area and filter quality. To emphasise that point I have two M-class vacuums (trade) which each use TWO washable primary filters. A pair of those filters currently cost around £80, which is why you take care of them!£250 vs £60 Amazon vacuum - is it really 4x better?
Industrial quality filtration (class M), designed to last for years (unless you let some idiot suck-up soot with them, in which case they get foobarred PDQ ), and there are two filters in the pack, not one (the vacuums I use are 2-filter vacuums) - to put it in perspective both my industrial vacs cost in the £400 to £500 range when new - there is almost no such thing as a cheap industrial vacuum. AFAIK those filters (Starmix/Metabo) are par for the course in terms of price against equivalent products from Bosch, DW, Fein, Festool, etc. I was just trying to highlight the fact that high quality filters aren't really that cheap.Hepa filter?
£80 - that's super expensive
My Henry uses cloth bags, few £ for 6 , have reused each bag about 20 times .A pack of 10 bags cost £15 say - just saying what I saw on Amazon.
After a bag is full, you throw away?? That makes it super expensive!
EDIT Seen others for £7.50 for 10 - the point still stands
I remember in the olden days, we used to empty bags and reuse them - means getting dust in the air when you empty.
Hepa filter?
£80 - that's super expensive
It's JUST plastic surely - nothing like the complex electronics and engines inside a vacuum?
@blup I'd live with those short falls and get the cheaper Amazon vacuum!
The Amazon bag hoover cost just over £50
The less powerful bagless one costs £60
If I were buying a hoover, I would consider the Amazon ones simply because of ratings - more than 8000 4.5 stars.
Not looking for one though... we have a refurbished Dyson we've had for years. It does it's job.
Sort of Mother of All Vacuum Cleaners? (MOAVAC)And then there's these https://www.quirepace.co.uk/products/industrial-vacuum-cleaners/products/centurion/ if you want something with a bit more power.....
40p each for paper Henry bags last time I stocked up. There must be a cost offset vs bagless and cleaning/replacing the filter (I presume you can't get "cyclonic" cylinder vacs).
I used my Karcher wet and dry as a pump to extract liquid clay slurry from my foundation trench - did the job but destroyed it. I reserve it's replacement for wet jobs as its a lot more expensive in consumables than Henry.
I have an Aldi vac.
wet/dry stainless body, I think it also blows, power take off with delay.
Sucks like a good hooker on a Friday night.
Mine was £70 or so and is my go to.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local