- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
It's reasonable to assume that if your parents migrated to a country seventy years ago on the invitation of the government to migrate, to fill the labour shortages, and your parents worked all their lives, that you as a child, being brought up, schooled, registered with governmental institutions, and completely integrated into the community, to the point that you assumed you were British, even held a passport, and never having visited the birth country of your parents (or in some cases deny you re-entry to UK), that you could assume that an application for UK residency would not be needed.. apparently it's all the conservatives fault that Jamaicans didn't bother applying for residence within the 50 years that they had the opportunity to
Unfortunately, you could not foresee that the ministers would mislead the government on illegal migration, and that government would enact an illegal hostile policy, apply unreasonable demands, deny you your legal rights, deny you medical treatment and other benefits, to which you were entitled, and forcibly repatriate you to a country that you'd never visited.
In addition, when the parents arrived in the UK, they neither needed any additional documents, nor were ever given any, nor were they ever advised that the changes in the law might give rise to the need for such documents, for them or their children, in the future.
Moreover, it wasn't the parents, the original migrants, that were affected, but their children, who might have been four or five years old when they arrived. It's reasonable to assume that if your parents have indefinite leave to remain, that you as a four or five year old dependent of them would automatically be included.
All previous BOT West Indian countries were affected, and other previous BOT such as Kenya, Cyprus, Canada, Sierra Leone, etc.
Despite requests from governments of these countries to the UK government to discuss the Hostile policy, and its repercussions, no such discussion was ever granted by UK government.
But if you want to blame anyone, and evidently you do, why not blame the Jamaicans. Your attitude and ill-informed opinion is disgusting. You are defending an illegal and inhumane policy of the UK government, instigated by two Home Secretaries, who mislead the government, one of whom had the integrity to resign and admit the mistake, which is an extreme rarity in todays politics.
Last edited: