Same with their dogs too, I say.Quite often, the 'type' of people that own these large, dangerous breeds of dogs do it to make themselves look hard and menacing. Having to have them castrated, chipped, insured, muzzled and kept on a lead in public
That is the point...Remind me please; did any "citizen" bite the dog attack victims?
Were the (dog attack) victims unable to fight off their "citizen" attackers?
That is the point...
All dogs are capable of inflicting a large amount of damage/kill a person...
But even human 'bullies' Tyson and Suarez (XL and M) coulkd only muster a little nip!
But the majority of dog attacks are on the owners/family members...A dog can only do what it likes if the owner lets it.
Talking of 'leads', what about those 'long line' friction leads...Don't confuse Secure; he's going for the chip-and-lead solution
Were they also starving and gasping for oxygen when you were travelling to all those countries you bragged of visiting? 70, wasn't it? Were you doing humanitarian work or something?But hey, let the poor of the world starve whilst some can pamper their pooches
I think it's your misunderstanding, not mine!I said "no big feggin' dogs" in #1.
So what are you prattling on about, 12 pages in, if you're making an argument out of actually agreeing with me?
FWIW, all I've seen you post is about licensing, training, insurance, and muzzling when in public.
Oh, and some false-equivalence about banning vehicles.
I think it's your misunderstanding, not mine!
You disagreed with what I said, then told me I was agreeing with you!!
And as for the car analogy, you must know what I'm saying about laws and rules being there to minimise injuries and deaths by people abusing those laws and rules.
But hey-ho, if you think I'm talking gibberish, fine.
I'm done with this now.
Don't forget to gloat and say you've won the argument!
I think I got the gist of what you said. I know dogs aren't cars, aren't guns etc, but, in the round, I don't disagree.And as for the car analogy, you must know what I'm saying about laws and rules being there to minimise injuries and deaths by people abusing those laws and rules.
No they aren’tAll dogs are capable of inflicting a large amount of damage/kill a person...
Go on thenSo it's not exactly rocket science to work out how to virtually eliminate the problem!
You don’t have a dog so you have zero clue what a wonderful addition they make to a familyBanning all dogs except working/care ones...
I think I got the gist of what you said. I know dogs aren't cars, aren't guns etc, but, in the round, I don't disagree.