FFS you lot really are proving the point.
So your saying air entrained water has no effect on NPSH and cavitation then?.
You are proving a point but, I fear, not the one you seem to think.
Entrained air has nothing to do with cavitation.
The difference is that cavitation involves the formation of bubbles of water vapour (or whatever liquid you're pumping) due to the high turbulence, high eddy velocities and low static pressure at the eye of the pump impeller. It involves Bernouilli; the velocity increases so the pressure drops and the liquid effectively boils at the pump inlet.
The difference is that, as the liquid passes the impeller, the static pressure increases and the vapour bubbles implode, ripping particles of bronze (or plastic) out of the impeller. Entrained or dissolved air doesn't do that.
Hemp is used on commercial (mainly) heating systems, some old sweats swear by it.
I said balancing is SIMPLIFIED not eliminated...big difference, the questions are to test the knowledge of the installer something you seem unable to comprehend.
And I say it again; if the heat emitters have large differences in their flow rates and hydraulic resistances, then balancing is not simplified. Balancing is made more difficult to the extent that the system cannot be balanced, despite the presence of commissioning sets with low flow and ultra-low flow double-regulating valves. This was a real installed system which defeated experienced commissioning engineers. The details should have been resolved at the design stage; it was not my design. The 'designer' assumed that reverse return would solve his balancing problems and it did not. The real problem was his lack of understanding of the fundamental fluid mechanics.
I don't do gas and didn't know there were ultrasonic meters. I don't much care, I'm not likely to have any need to get inside a gas meter.
Perhaps instead of offering pathetic criticism and showing your distinct lack of knowledge you would care to offer the OP constructive advice rather than perpetuating the stereotypical plumber/heating installer.
I do not criticize. I simply state facts as I understand them, which differ from your versions.
I don't think the OP is what he/she claims and have no interest in helping him.