- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,830
- Reaction score
- 865
- Country
It is just another term for low paid. Wages need to go up to take into account the work done. Why should a care worker be on the same pay as a shelf stacker, or a crop picker earn the same as a call centre worker ?. Crop picking , I would think, is pretty hard work, so if we have to pay more for our sprouts and spuds at Christmas, then so be it.
A very valid question. This is why we have minimum wage. Many people believe minimum wage should be higher.
If you work, regardless of what you are doing, you should be able to earn enough to live a decent life and have a good home.
But pay scales are driven by supply and demand. eg. web designers used to earn loads, but now that any kid leaving school can build an OK website, salaries have dropped.
Plumbers earn well, because there is a high demand for them and often an emergency element (heating / hot water not working, something leaking etc)
Because you can use just about anybody for unskilled / low skilled jobs, supply is large for relatively low demand, so companies can get away with paying minimum wage, and even putting people on zero hour contracts. This is considered by many to be an outdated and unfair system of determining pay. Why should a cleaner get paid less than an accountant?
Some companies have ignored these social norms though, and pay everybody equally, and say it makes the whole company a better place to be and workers much happier.
Crop picking is bloody hard work. Several times, British farmers have attempted to employ British workers (and American farmers tried the same) and Brits and Americans just could not handle the work. People don't want to break their backs, get soaked, sun burnt, have to work 12 hour days in summer, to earn a living. This is the real reason immigrants have been doing these jobs for centuries - and also why much of farming has been mechanised.