Why the channel illegals irritate me.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Did you miss my question John?
One doesn't need to specifically state that they hate something, it is easily assumed by their persistent denigration of that group.
Similarly, I do not need to present evidence that transam hates foreigners, Romanians, Muslims, Iranians, Chinese, etc. It is apparent from his continuous diatribe against them, and his desire to commit genocide.

Similarly, it is not necessary for me to present evidence of him saying he hates these groups in society, because it is common knowledge.
 
Let’s not let facts get in the way of a bigoted insult, eh John.
 
Sponsored Links
Is that a pile of terrified Romanian sheep I see the French burning?
 
To claim asylum from a brutal EU regime ?
No, from leaving their country of origin and unable to return.
Read the UK government advice, instead of making bigoted and nonsensical guesses.
There is no obligation for refugees to claim asylum in any specific country. They are free to choose where they wish to claim asylum.
UK has voluntarily exited the Dublin Agreement which might have allowed them to deport refugees to other countries. Now that option is no longer available.
 
Is that a pile of terrified Romanian sheep I see the French burning?
I suggest you visit Barnard Castle. I hear there is a Specsavers there.
But don't drive, especially with any women and children on board. That wouldn't be safe nor wise.
 
Can we kick out foreign criminals ? If people enter the UK illegally they are criminals, so they can be removed.
If refugees entered the UK illegally, it wouldn't be via the Channel. That's the legal route. In fact over any water, by any means is the legal route. :rolleyes:
So how could refugees enter illegally?

As for exporting criminals that have been refused asylum, that's up to the justice system. But that is totally unrelated to this topic, which is about incorrectly describing channel refugees as illegals. It's a misnomer.
But I can understand why you want to divert the discussion because it's dead in the water. It was a misnomer when it started.
 
They only claim asylum if they are caught, otherwise they just slip into the ether.
Hopefully the majority of refugees are caught, or surrender to officials, and they become 'legal'. :rolleyes:

Does it suggest that people traffickers are so familiar with the system, that they can send refugees over the channel, and advise UK border officials of their imminent arrival?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top