Will Boris Survive The Day?
- Thread starter Dork Lard
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
Sadly the last two times he was sacked for lying, he wasn't surrounded by other lying sycophants.
Well, he wasn't actually there (he was at Chequers probably having his own party) but it was the chief of communications that broke the rules. Apparently they sent someone out with a suitcase to bring back more booze.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59989946
The man before Slack
Cain served as the Downing Street Director of Communications from 2019 to 2020. In an article about the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Johnson was hospitalised, it was commented that "Lee was running the country, genuinely, for quite some time."[9] In November 2020, Cain resigned from his position, and stated that he would leave office at the end of the year.[10][11] Cain had previously been mentioned as a possible selection for Downing Street Chief of Staff.[12]P
In 2021, Cain started his own PR communications agency, Charlesbye
https://www.charlesbyestrategy.com/#about
People in this position seem to have similar backgrounds.
Cain served as the Downing Street Director of Communications from 2019 to 2020. In an article about the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Johnson was hospitalised, it was commented that "Lee was running the country, genuinely, for quite some time."[9] In November 2020, Cain resigned from his position, and stated that he would leave office at the end of the year.[10][11] Cain had previously been mentioned as a possible selection for Downing Street Chief of Staff.[12]P
In 2021, Cain started his own PR communications agency, Charlesbye
https://www.charlesbyestrategy.com/#about
People in this position seem to have similar backgrounds.
Sponsored Links
I don't know if it has been said before - it must have been - but it is not the callousness of the party goers which is the important aspect.
It is the obvious fact that they thought the restrictions being imposed by themselves on everyone else were not necessary.
It is the obvious fact that they thought the restrictions being imposed by themselves on everyone else were not necessary.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,786
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
Perhaps they thought as they already worked together they could get away with some drinks after work. I'm not condoning what they did, it was obviously wrong, but I don't think it means what you are suggesting.
I still can't understand why most of the governments in the world acted as they did if it wasn't necessary.
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
Common sense would suggest that if you've been working with a group of people all day, then socialising with the same group of people would be OK. But the rules did not allow for that.
And government representatives should obey the rules that they make irrespective of whether they think it might be OK to ignore them.
If say, a Catholic priest confessed his sins to another priest, and he was expected to say a few Hail Marys. It wouldn't be OK for him to think he needn't bother, because it doesn't make any difference.
If you make the rules, you live by them, however much they appear to go against common sense.
Nope, that doesn't explain why they ignored the restrictions that they imposed for others.
I know you can't.
one of the parties was to celebrate Johnson recovering from ICU
So if they thought they were unnecessary they were clearly thick as the evidence was staring them in the face
That's even dafter.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,786
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
It was a suggestion and was every bit as valid as yours.
Primarily because no one on here seems to know either. Control and the Great Reset was mentioned, which mean absolutely nothing when mentioned in isolation.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,786
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
Can you explain it to me? I'll try harder this time.
do you mean all gov people had parties
It's blisteringly obvious. Any health system in any country can only cope with so many people at any one time. When they are coping and as it turns out with covid far more people recover than die. People get in due to low blood oxygen levels due to breathing difficulties. If those go too low the first step appears to be a coma. If it carries on death. End result if people don't get in a lot more death. Danger ages go down to ~30 based on the number of those that have been in at times.
Looks line Omicron carries some bad news. Vaccines less effective over time. Hence the booster "panic". Also the performance of 2 Az jabs. Pf is better against Delta. At some point neither are terribly good against Omicron. I did wonder when there was a surge in London. Anyway sounds like restrictions will be ended on the 28th unless Boris wants to upstage Wales. Testing results are seen as dubious for various reasons but hospitalisation is falling in London so others will follow.
Booster effectiveness not really enough info as yet especially over time. Looks good currently. Find the vaccine effectiveness report yourselves. They have just added an Omicron section.
The PHE report doesn't hold much new really. Deaths seem to be around ~1000 / week and stablish. ICU/HDU much the same but looks like more very old may be making it to there. Usual culprits in there age wise,
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,786
- Reaction score
- 2,353
- Country
Not to the antivaxxers. It is just one big hoax as far as they are concerned.
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
