http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-35867961"Nato is costing us a fortune, and yes, we're protecting Europe, but we're spending a lot of money."
Perhaps the single biggest headline from Mr Trump's remarks ... came from his views on European security and the role of US alliances. He said Americans are shouldering too much of a burden among Nato nations ....
"Ukraine is a country that affects us far less than it affects other countries in Nato, and yet we are doing all of the lifting, they're not doing anything,"
He added that the "concept" of Nato is good, but that it is a product of a different time, when the US was wealthier.
Mr Trump's objection to the burdens of current US international commitments isn't limited to Europe either. He also pointed to South Korea as a nation that needs to do more to compensate the US.
According to Mr Trump, the US needs to turn its focus to the problems it has at home.
Somewhat hypothetical, then.Is it possible, with Trump as President, (not that I think he won't have his ass kicked by Clinton) that the special relationship would deteriorate somewhat?
Of course. That's why I prefaced it with:Somewhat hypothetical, then.Is it possible, with Trump as President, (not that I think he won't have his ass kicked by Clinton) that the special relationship would deteriorate somewhat?
Of course. The subject matter is irrelevant. The argument is immaterial. The debate is besides the point.Because I dislike your superior, know-it-all attitude and absolute certainty based on no more than your personal view.
You really are rather an obnoxious person, aren't you.
Of course. That's why I prefaced it with:Somewhat hypothetical, then.Is it possible, with Trump as President, (not that I think he won't have his ass kicked by Clinton) that the special relationship would deteriorate somewhat?
"('cos I don't think it'll ever get to that)"
That kinda illustrates that I'm talking hypothetical, d'ya think?
So now do you think that your comment was superfluous?
Maybe you just jump at every opportunity to make a silly comment?
Why is that I wonder:
Of course. The subject matter is irrelevant. The argument is immaterial. The debate is besides the point.Because I dislike your superior, know-it-all attitude and absolute certainty based on no more than your personal view.
You really are rather an obnoxious person, aren't you.
It's, me, the contributor, in your case, that causes you these brain fade moments.
I am just trying to be as irritating as you but I'm not as good at it.Maybe you just jump at every opportunity to make a silly comment?
Why is that I wonder:
Can you please explain what you meant with the "by a woman!" As it appears only a sexist or a misogynist would infer women are inferior to men. You may have not meant that but thought I would ask.I can't wait to see Trump's ass being well and truly kicked by a woman!
Bring it on!
He's still googling and formulating a reply.Can you please explain what you meant with the "by a woman!" As it appears only a sexist or a misogynist would infer women are inferior to men. You may have not meant that but thought I would ask.I can't wait to see Trump's ass being well and truly kicked by a woman!
Bring it on!
Fender and Wrangler - Don't be unfair; it was just a question.I can't wait to see Trump's ass being well and truly kicked by a woman!
Bring it on!
Trump comes across as a misogynist. Simples!Can you please explain what you meant with the "by a woman!" As it appears only a sexist or a misogynist would infer women are inferior to men. You may have not meant that but thought I would ask.
My apologies fender. I didn't realise you were hanging on to my every word. Some of us have real lives which tend to be more demanding than reading and replying to silly messages on social media.He's still googling and formulating a reply.
It could be some time.......