Right now... probably not. I doubt they have the courage to do what is best for the country.Than those MP's who are staunch remainers ? & they are in the majority (?) can stop Brexit & stop the country leaving the E.U .
but will they ???
Right now... probably not. I doubt they have the courage to do what is best for the country.Than those MP's who are staunch remainers ? & they are in the majority (?) can stop Brexit & stop the country leaving the E.U .
but will they ???
http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/08/news/economy/uk-economy-brexit-25-billion/index.htmlGovernment tax revenues will fall by as much as £31 billion ($38.4 billion) by 2019, if there is no major policy change. If it stops all payments to the European Union, the government could save £6 billion ($7.4 billion) a year.
Ahh so we were f***d either way.Oh dear....
http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/08/news/economy/uk-economy-brexit-25-billion/index.htmlGovernment tax revenues will fall by as much as £31 billion ($38.4 billion) by 2019, if there is no major policy change. If it stops all payments to the European Union, the government could save £6 billion ($7.4 billion) a year.
Read more: //www.diynot.com/diy/threads/you-were-correct-all-along-johnd.470302/page-5#ixzz4PWhMN5hC
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. You remember them? They predicted Brexit would be bad.
Not either way, but due to Brexit. Here is the headline:Ahh so we were f***d either way.
And we haven't even left yet.The U.K. government is facing a £25 billion ($31 billion) hole in its finances because of Brexit, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said Tuesday.
Continuing subsidies for farmers and fishermen
And not forgetting grants such as a local waste to energy plant here in Hull:
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/how-...t-and-beyond/story-29824319-detail/story.html
The amount of EU funded projects in the UK is staggering when you take a close look.
Right now... probably not. I doubt they have the courage to do what is best for the country.
and to other landowners, such as Ian Duncan Smith's prosperous family,
"The minister responsible for cutting income support for the poor, Iain Duncan Smith, lives on an estate owned by his wife's family. During the last 10 years it has received €1.5m in income support from taxpayers."
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...rm-subsidies-blatant-transfer-of-cash-to-rich
Mr Smith is famously opposed to handout and subsidies (but only when they go to the poor)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...st-vulnerable-people-in-britain-a6941116.html
and
"I doubt Dacre knows much more about farming than the average reader of his newspaper, but you don’t have to be a farmer to receive this money; the rules say only that you must have “eligible land at your disposal”."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/21/waste-cash-leavers-in-out-land-subsidie
Luckily, not a problem to the billionaire owner of the Daily Mail, Lord Rothermere, as he doesn't pay tax.
- The gross contribution in 2015 was £17.8bn but the UK rebate was worth £4.9bn
What do you think 17.8 - (4.9+4.4) is?
- £4.4bn was also paid back to the UK government for farm subsidies and other programmes
Also
After Brexit, the UK would still have to contribute to the EU budget to retain access to the single market
The Outists say they would continue paying the Landowners subsidy out of UK taxation.
The loss of revenue resulting from UK losing trade by resigning from the EU would be somewhere between A Lot and A Huge Amount.
And perhaps not.
"The government ends post Brexit uncertainty by guaranteeing subsidies for food production until 2020, but leaves a question mark over environment subsidies."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07nn86n
"They would more accurately be described as land subsidies, as they are paid by the hectare. The more land you own or lease, the more public money you are given, so the richest people in Europe clean up. And not just in Europe: Russian oligarchs, Saudi princes and Wall Street bankers have bought up tracts of European farmland, thus qualifying for the vast sums we shovel into their pockets."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/21/waste-cash-leavers-in-out-land-subsidie
"This is arguably the most regressive distribution of public money in modern times. Taxpayers of all stations stock the wine cellars of dukes and hedge fund managers. As much as 80% of the funds are harvested by the richest 25% of recipients. The poorest farmers are excluded: you cannot claim subsidies unless you own or lease at least five hectares. A report by the European court of auditors reveals that the EU has no useful data on farm incomes, and therefore no knowledge of whether farm subsidies serve any social purpose."
You may be aware that Iain Duncan Smith's multi-millionaire family receives vastly more in state handouts than the poor or disabled, whose benefits he was so keen to cut.