1980’s again

  • Thread starter Deleted member 221031
  • Start date
No they aren't, any specific ones in mind?

They never left nuclear energy.
They aren’t building anymore and are building reactors to hit the target.

It’s not hard to grasp Denny. Renewables can’t get them to the target, so a u turn and back to the 80’s.

I never said they stopped with nuclear energy. Is that a “gut feeling” But they Certainly moved away from it, and they are moving back to it now.

So the only way Sweden can hit net zero is with a load more nuclear reactors. That’s a massive fail.
 
Sponsored Links
So they are scrapping wind farms in favour of nuclear reactors? Which is all I said.
Hardly, here is your claim,

 
Hardly, here is your claim,

Where did I post that ? But from that post is this:

Instead, the Swedish Government is shifting back to nuclear power and has ditched its targets for a “100% renewable energy” supply.

So your post proves my point. You’re getting good at that.
 
Sponsored Links
Post #6. Play your silly troll games with someone else.
No game.

I posted something which is true. Renewables can’t get Sweden to net zero, so they have switched their focus back to nuclear energy, which they moved away from in 1980. Hardly a reason for you to get wound up.

What’s not true about that?
 
What’s not true about that?
This is the the thrust of the article, in bold, at the top of the first page which you linked to, "Sweden Dumps Climate Agenda, Scraps Green Energy Targets". It is lies, they have not done either.

When I pointed that out you said that you didn't write it, you only quoted it. What a stupid thing to say.
Renewables can’t get Sweden to net zero
So what? They now say they need more electricity generation by 2040 so will use nuclear power to produce the extra needed to get there. Again, so what? This is to enable them to meet their net zero emissions target by 2045. To claim that they are dumping their climate agenda and scrapping green energy targets is blatant lying. But I forgot, you didn't write the article did you.
 
This is the the thrust of the article, in bold, at the top of the first page which you linked to, "Sweden Dumps Climate Agenda, Scraps Green Energy Targets". It is lies, they have not done either.

When I pointed that out you said that you didn't write it, you only quoted it. What a stupid thing to say.

So what? They now say they need more electricity generation by 2040 so will use nuclear power to produce the extra needed to get there. Again, so what? This is to enable them to meet their net zero emissions target by 2045. To claim that they are dumping their climate agenda and scrapping green energy targets is blatant lying. But I forgot, you didn't write the article did you.
No I only posted it. But Google it! As I’ve said it’s on numerous websites. Maybe even one or two you approve of ?

Sweden have no faith in renewables now. But they are always a head of the “Curve”

So from now on I can only post articles I wrote ?

I wonder which country will drop renewables next ? Germany I’d say.
 
Sweden has a tiny population v size of the country. So why the struggle with renewable energy?

That means when the uk realises renewables are useless, we will have a reactor in every city.

@denso13 would you rather live next to a windmill or a reactor
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top