2 Bloody Years!
- Thread starter conny
- Start date
Sponsored Links
D
daneski88
I know of someone on this very site who will read venable's claims and feel that in retrospect, his victim had it coming to him
The 'something' Prentice is the fact that he continually breaks the law.there is something that tells me that he
Now there's 'breaking the law' and there's 'breaking the law'. There are those that set out to break the law and there are those that break the law because of those that have set out to break the law. Tony Martin killed a burglar. So Tony Martin 'broke the law' but as we've all said before, if the scum of the earth burglar hadn't been in Tony Martin's home he wouldn't have been killed. Simple!
It's a little off topic but I just want to show the inconsistency and absurdity of the Parole system. When Tony Martin became eligible for parole and early release in January 2003, the Parole Board rejected his application without stating a reason. The chairman of the parole board, Sir David Hatch, in an interview with The Times described Martin as "a very dangerous man" who may still believe his action had been right (yeah like the rest of right thinking people in society!!!!). Martin challenged the decision in the High Court, where the parole board's decision was upheld. Probation officers on Martin's cases said there was an "unacceptable risk" that Martin might again react with excessive force if other would-be burglars intruded on his Norfolk farm. AND your point is???? That's the problem with the law and the Parole system, it favours criminals. Tony Martin in MANY peoples opinion was NOT, IS NOT a criminal. He was and old man living on his own minding his own business when two CRIMINALS entered his property in the dead of night. How scared must he have been? And because he wouldn't say he was remorseful and or sorry for taking the action that he did, the Parole Board decided he was still a risk to.... 'would-be burglars intruding on his Norfolk farm.' Well if that's not the biggest piece of shyte I've EVER read I don't know what is.
Bls,
I lived within a mile by road of Tony Martin. He was and is a feck ing nut and should count himself very lucky to be out of prison. He had used firearms before shooting at people that he thought were stealing from him(scrumping apples) and shot his brothers windows out over a disagreement. Would he do the same again, of course he would given the chance. He get's lionised by people because he shot a thieving piky but it could have quite easily been someone walking the footpaths through his land.
As for venables. Had he not been one of young Jamie bulger's killers how long would he have got? three months if he'd been an actor. Maybe nothing if he had been a famous rock star doing research. I wonder how many of us would have carried out the things we claim we would had we been presented with two ten year old boys and told to do your worst.
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,655
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
I still say if the ***** hadn't been in his house he wouldn't have been killed. Simple. The world is a better place without such scum.
Sponsored Links
D
daneski88
Just because Martin was wrong in many cases doesn't mean he got it wrong on this occasion
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 6,655
- Reaction score
- 290
- Country
If you think you have a point then start a new thread then.
If you think you have a point then start a new thread then.
Don't think we could face going through it all again
M
Mickymoody
An ex criminal is not allowed to sell their story, that's part of their license, and if they did, then whoever published it would be held in contempt, so wouldn't publish it. Plus with the media restrictions, it wouldn't be worth publishing it, as most wouldn't be allowed. So where did you see that?
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Big_Spark
- General Discussion
