Or to put it more simply Eric, we have about half the rate of electrical 'incidents' in the UK compared to the average across Europe.
If you run the cables in a void filled with insulation you'll have to derate the current carrying capacity. OTOH, if you cut into the Celotex you'll reduce its insulating properties.Sure I could fill most the void up with insulation and then it have a practical benefit, but might it just be better to chase a route into the celotex that will line the house inner, put an oval duct in it, and run the cables in that? (the air tightness membrane would go on the outside(world) side of the duct rather than having the duct come through the AT membrane
Radials are in no sense 'new' - originally, that's all we had, and had it not been for WWII (and the consequential apparent shortage of copper etc.) , we would never have got rings.and herems me thinking radials were "new and new is better" than the old ring.. should i be asking for rings in my new build hwith the exception of some high power radials to the kitchen)
True, if you duplicate the CPC.In function terms, there is certainly nothing that can b achieved with rings which can't also be achieved with radials.
But all in all I agree with Flounders and Swan well maybe not English I would say British but to quote "The English the English the English are best the English are best and to hell with the rest"
In viw of what you recently wrote, suspected that you might say that! I'm not convinced that achieving redundancy of CPCs is, in itself, an adequate reason for using ring finals. Let's face it, we're only talking about sockets circuits - everything else (lighting, cookers, showers, immersions, outbuildings etc.) is wired with radials, and I've never heard anyone suggest that we should duplicate their CPCs!True, if you duplicate the CPC.In function terms, there is certainly nothing that can b achieved with rings which can't also be achieved with radials.
Perhaps we should - and whilst we're at it, perhaps we should also duplicate RCDs, maybe MCBs/fuses and even maybe isolating switches!That's true. Perhaps we should?
If you run the cables in a void filled with insulation you'll have to derate the current carrying capacity. OTOH, if you cut into the Celotex you'll reduce its insulating properties.Sure I could fill most the void up with insulation and then it have a practical benefit, but might it just be better to chase a route into the celotex that will line the house inner, put an oval duct in it, and run the cables in that? (the air tightness membrane would go on the outside(world) side of the duct rather than having the duct come through the AT membrane
Radials are in no sense 'new' - originally, that's all we had, and had it not been for WWII (and the consequential apparent shortage of copper etc.) , we would never have got rings.
Goodness knows - I suspect the 'shortage', if there was one, was more due to high demand than low supply. I think it was well after the 50s that I first saw any copper pipe in domestic plumbing.We has a semi built in 1952 when there was a timber shortage but should have been at the height of any copper shortage caused by the war. ... Was the copper shortage really the cause? THere was far more copper in the piping!
If it was originally wired with 15A sockets, it obviously could not have been wired as a ring - ring finals have (for fairly obvious reasons) only ever been allowed with BS1363 sockets.It was wired with radials - 15A radials with one socket per radial, most of the 15A sockets had been swopped for 13A.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local