Tat comment about Intelligence was directed at the inane and childish attacks certain posters have entered into in this thread, and I note that a certain poster has launched into such attacks in other threads, they obviously think they are funny, I personally think they are simply sad.
Regarding your question about my thoughts. I agree that the idea of a decentralised political system, where the MP representing a given area is a person who lives in that community, so they understand what that community truly needs and desires, and are answerable to the people of that community is a good one. I can see that set up correctly, this is a far better system than we currently have. However there are aspects were I would not agree with FWL_Engineer, whilst the MP's need to be accountable, this idead of X percentage being able to force them out of office I am uncomfortable with, that would, in my opinion, be a route that some could take to undermine the political system for their own benefit, or simply to cause mischief. I would also not be in favour of the fining of those who shoose not to vote in an election, but I do agree with mandatory voting, not sure about the age drop to 16 though. Some panned the idea of the fines for the wrong reasons, they stated that there would need to be a way for the Government to trace voters from their ballot papers to do this, well they already can, how else do you think they confirmed how people voted in Birmingham and managed to prove there was fraud on a massive scale?
Adding the abstantion vote to a ballot paper is a good idea, that way if people do not wish to vote for anyone in their area, they can simply abstain, at least then we could see what this figure was and determine what could be done to correct that problem and re-engage the public in the political process. I like the idea of the funding of Politics, cutting big business out of the loop would be a positive step to reducing actual or seeming undue influence at best, and corruption at worst. It would take some working out so ensure it was fair and above board, but it has the potential, if implemented, to be far superior to our existing system of funding.
Personally I take the original post by FWL_Engineer as a topic for discussion, not some manifesto for world domination as some appear to have taken it, it is far from perfect and could never be implemented in the way he has posted it, but no political system has ever been resolved first time, it takes discussion and trial and error, some members really need to chill out and take a step back before posting, and I really do not understand the personal attacks.
Regarding your question about my thoughts. I agree that the idea of a decentralised political system, where the MP representing a given area is a person who lives in that community, so they understand what that community truly needs and desires, and are answerable to the people of that community is a good one. I can see that set up correctly, this is a far better system than we currently have. However there are aspects were I would not agree with FWL_Engineer, whilst the MP's need to be accountable, this idead of X percentage being able to force them out of office I am uncomfortable with, that would, in my opinion, be a route that some could take to undermine the political system for their own benefit, or simply to cause mischief. I would also not be in favour of the fining of those who shoose not to vote in an election, but I do agree with mandatory voting, not sure about the age drop to 16 though. Some panned the idea of the fines for the wrong reasons, they stated that there would need to be a way for the Government to trace voters from their ballot papers to do this, well they already can, how else do you think they confirmed how people voted in Birmingham and managed to prove there was fraud on a massive scale?
Adding the abstantion vote to a ballot paper is a good idea, that way if people do not wish to vote for anyone in their area, they can simply abstain, at least then we could see what this figure was and determine what could be done to correct that problem and re-engage the public in the political process. I like the idea of the funding of Politics, cutting big business out of the loop would be a positive step to reducing actual or seeming undue influence at best, and corruption at worst. It would take some working out so ensure it was fair and above board, but it has the potential, if implemented, to be far superior to our existing system of funding.
Personally I take the original post by FWL_Engineer as a topic for discussion, not some manifesto for world domination as some appear to have taken it, it is far from perfect and could never be implemented in the way he has posted it, but no political system has ever been resolved first time, it takes discussion and trial and error, some members really need to chill out and take a step back before posting, and I really do not understand the personal attacks.